Re: [Bro-Dev] Broker's remote logging (BIT-1784)

> On Feb 6, 2017, at 10:43 AM, Robin Sommer wrote: > > I propose that for now we make Broker work like the current model, and > then we go from there. If we need more, we can add that later. The > less semantic differences we have between old and new communication, > the easier

Re: [Bro-Dev] Broker's remote logging (BIT-1784)

On Sun, Feb 05, 2017 at 22:04 +, you wrote: > I understand the argument that the old semantics (manager not running > log events/filters) may be more performant, though, I’d consider > whether the internal comm. framework or the base/user scripts should > be the one to decide. I agree that