Re: [Bro-Dev] early performance comparisons of CAF-based run loop

> On Apr 19, 2017, at 2:55 AM, Robin Sommer wrote: > >> Just a quick comment here regarding FreeBSD: the native polling >> mechanism is kqueue, and CAF still lacks support for it [1]. >> Fortunately, this is a rather straight-forward task. > > Oh, sounds like that would be

Re: [Bro-Dev] early performance comparisons of CAF-based run loop

On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 07:56 -0700, you wrote: > Just a quick comment here regarding FreeBSD: the native polling > mechanism is kqueue, and CAF still lacks support for it [1]. > Fortunately, this is a rather straight-forward task. Oh, sounds like that would be high-priority task then before