Vern Paxson created BIT-1407:
Summary: -f silently fails if base/frameworks/packet-filter isn't
loaded
Key: BIT-1407
URL: https://bro-tracker.atlassian.net/browse/BIT-1407
Project: Bro Issue Tracker
[
https://bro-tracker.atlassian.net/browse/BIT-1407?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=20900#comment-20900
]
Robin Sommer commented on BIT-1407:
---
Yeah, I can see that. I think the main problem is th
[
https://bro-tracker.atlassian.net/browse/BIT-1407?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Seth Hall updated BIT-1407:
---
Attachment: signature.asc
We could alternately take the additional step of moving command line argument
pr
[
https://bro-tracker.atlassian.net/browse/BIT-1407?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=20902#comment-20902
]
Robin Sommer commented on BIT-1407:
---
If we had that, the '-f' switch would probably be ad
[
https://bro-tracker.atlassian.net/browse/BIT-1407?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=20903#comment-20903
]
Vern Paxson commented on BIT-1407:
--
While there's an appeal to processing arguments in script-
[
https://bro-tracker.atlassian.net/browse/BIT-1407?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=20904#comment-20904
]
Vern Paxson commented on BIT-1407:
--
Also, regarding the policy script adding the -f flag: how
On Sat, May 30, 2015 at 15:31 -0500, you wrote:
> Jira, I couldn't find the thread). But to revisit: the "-f filter"
> option silently does nothing if base/frameworks/packet-filter isn't
> loaded (so the scenario here is using -b to suppress its automatic
> loading). This can lead to seriously
> On Jun 1, 2015, at 11:10 AM, Robin Sommer wrote:
>
> Yeah, I can see that. I think the main problem is the interaction
> between the command-line option and script, something that's rare
> (i.e., that the command-line option is tight that closely to a script
> being loaded). I would actually s
On Mon, Jun 01, 2015 at 10:20 -0500, you wrote:
> We could alternately take the additional step of moving command line
> argument processing into Bro scripts. I don’t know how exactly we’d
> solve this particular problem, but it should be reasonably solvable
> that way.
If we had that, the '-f
