On Sat, May 13, 2017 at 00:28 -0500, you wrote:
> We'll look at upgrading our test cluster (and UIUC's test cluster) to
> master.
Sounds good, let us know how that is going.
Robin
--
Robin Sommer * ICSI/LBNL * ro...@icir.org * www.icir.org/robin
Correct, I agree. I just did another review of CHANGES, and didn't spot
anything concerning. We'll look at upgrading our test cluster (and UIUC's
test cluster) to master.
On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 8:48 PM, Slagell, Adam J
wrote:
>
>
> > On May 12, 2017, at 4:09 PM, Seth Hall
> On May 12, 2017, at 9:48 PM, Slagell, Adam J wrote:
>
>
>
>> On May 12, 2017, at 4:09 PM, Seth Hall wrote:
>>
>> I'd be fine with that. I think master is quite stable right now anyway
>
>
> I'm pretty sure Vlad is in agreement, but traveling
Looking over Changes, there is nothing that I am especially concerned
about at a cursory glance.
Johanna
On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 05:08:51PM -0400, Seth Hall wrote:
>
> > On May 12, 2017, at 4:34 PM, Robin Sommer wrote:
> >
> > I just went through the CHANGES since 2.5 and
> >
> On May 12, 2017, at 4:09 PM, Seth Hall wrote:
>
> I'd be fine with that. I think master is quite stable right now anyway
I'm pretty sure Vlad is in agreement, but traveling today. I think Justin as
well, but I should let him speak for himself.
On 5/12/17 4:33 PM, Slagell, Adam J wrote:
>
>
> My understanding is that we still have some stochastic tests that fail
> for timing issues, but not if run manually on master. Is that correct?
>
> :Adam
Correct. I haven't seen any failing tests recently
that indicate a real problem in the
On May 12, 2017, at 4:08 PM, Seth Hall
> wrote:
I'd be fine with that. I think master is quite stable right now anyway.
Agreed.
My understanding is that we still have some stochastic tests that fail for
timing issues, but not if run manually on
> On May 12, 2017, at 4:34 PM, Robin Sommer wrote:
>
> I just went through the CHANGES since 2.5 and
> I can see snapshotting current master as 2.5.1 if folks here are fine
> with doing a broader release (which will need a bit more testing than
> just a bugfix update would).