Yes, you're right. :-) You know my code better than myself.
Regards,
Elias
On 9 July 2014 10:50, David B. Lamkins wrote:
> Hmm? It's in *gnu-apl-keymap* on my systems...
>
> On Wed, 2014-07-09 at 10:30 +0800, Elias Mårtenson wrote:
> > Wow. This is the first I heard of χ. Shouldn't it be mapp
That's only because I wondered what χ is used for right after the layout
change. ;)
On Wed, 2014-07-09 at 10:57 +0800, Elias Mårtenson wrote:
> Yes, you're right. :-) You know my code better than myself.
>
>
> Regards,
> Elias
>
>
> On 9 July 2014 10:50, David B. Lamkins wrote:
> Hmm
Hmm? It's in *gnu-apl-keymap* on my systems...
On Wed, 2014-07-09 at 10:30 +0800, Elias Mårtenson wrote:
> Wow. This is the first I heard of χ. Shouldn't it be mapped to the
> keyboard somewhere?
On 9 July 2014 11:17, David B. Lamkins wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-07-09 at 11:14 +0800, Elias Mårtenson wrote:
> > I'm still wondering what ⌺ (quad-diamond), ¢ (cent-sign) and £
> > (pound-sign) are used for.
> >
>
> Well, the currency symbols are pretty obvious... At least to an
> American. ;)
>
Wel
On Wed, 2014-07-09 at 11:14 +0800, Elias Mårtenson wrote:
> I'm still wondering what ⌺ (quad-diamond), ¢ (cent-sign) and £
> (pound-sign) are used for.
>
Well, the currency symbols are pretty obvious... At least to an
American. ;)
>
> Oh, and having support for ⍣ (star-diaeresis) as in Dyalog w
I'm still wondering what ⌺ (quad-diamond), ¢ (cent-sign) and £ (pound-sign)
are used for.
Oh, and having support for ⍣ (star-diaeresis) as in Dyalog would be nice.
Should it be implemented?
Regards,
Elias
On 9 July 2014 11:10, David B. Lamkins wrote:
> That's only because I wondered what χ is
Wow. This is the first I heard of χ. Shouldn't it be mapped to the keyboard
somewhere?
Regards,
Elias
On 9 July 2014 00:44, David Lamkins wrote:
> Thanks, Jüergen. Confirmed fixed.
>
>
>
> On Sun, Jul 6, 2014 at 7:45 AM, Juergen Sauermann <
> juergen.sauerm...@t-online.de> wrote:
>
>> Hi Davi
Thanks, Jüergen. Confirmed fixed.
On Sun, Jul 6, 2014 at 7:45 AM, Juergen Sauermann <
juergen.sauerm...@t-online.de> wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> thanks, fixed in SVN 363.
>
> Please note that using a value as right function argument of an operator
> is IMHO a rather dubious construct. I know that I
Hi David,
thanks, fixed in SVN 363.
Please note that using a value as right function argument of an operator
is IMHO a rather dubious construct. I know that IBM APL2 allows it, but the
ISO standard is rather unclear about it. On one hand ISO defines the ⍤
operator
using a value *y *as right op
The last time I worked on my component-file code was circa SVN 220. At
the time, I was using a defined operator that took a constant function
as its right function. Something akin to this, where g would always be a
constant function, e.g. {1}:
∇z←l (f foo g) r
z←(r f l) (l g r)
∇
At the time, I
10 matches
Mail list logo
