Re: [Bug-apl] Newly introduced bug

2014-10-02 Thread Juergen Sauermann
Hi Blake, that is exactly how things work already. Your case was just missing; I have added it. /// Jürgen On 10/02/2014 06:18 PM, Blake McBride wrote: Dear Juergen, That fixed the prob

Re: [Bug-apl] Newly introduced bug

2014-10-02 Thread Elias Mårtenson
The test file format is actually very simple. It's just a set of of functions and their expected return value. Regards, Elias On 3 October 2014 00:18, Blake McBride wrote: > Dear Juergen, > > That fixed the problem. Thanks. However, this scares me a little bit - > random basic functionality f

Re: [Bug-apl] Newly introduced bug

2014-10-02 Thread Blake McBride
Dear Juergen, That fixed the problem. Thanks. However, this scares me a little bit - random basic functionality failing. Perhaps I can suggest the following. Create a test suite that, for now, just tests a bench of somewhat random stuff that you think are good tests. Then, every time someone

Re: [Bug-apl] Newly introduced bug

2014-10-02 Thread Juergen Sauermann
Hi Blake, thanks, fixed in SVN  483. /// Jürgen On 10/02/2014 01:58 PM, Blake McBride wrote: IBM APL2:       'Y'∨.≠2 2⍴'X' 1 1

[Bug-apl] Newly introduced bug

2014-10-02 Thread Blake McBride
IBM APL2: 'Y'∨.≠2 2⍴'X' 1 1 GNU APL: 'y'∨.≠2 2⍴'x' LENGTH ERROR 'y'∨.≠2 2⍴'x' ^^ Thanks. Blake