Re: [Bug-AUCTeX] Re: preview-1.248; preview completely broken?

2005-04-26 Thread David Kastrup
Richard Lewis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > David Kastrup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >>> [The stuff below is with >>> > > with debug-on-signal the first backtrace produced is: > > Debugger entered--Lisp error: (wrong-type-argument arrayp nil) > coding-system-plist(nil) > coding-system-get(n

[Bug-AUCTeX] Re: preview-1.248; preview completely broken?

2005-04-26 Thread Richard Lewis
David Kastrup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> [The stuff below is with >> >> emacs -Q >> `M-: (require 'tex-site) RET' >> `M-: (load "preview-latex") RET' >> `C-C C-P C-d' > > It helps if you are not reporting falsehoods. The backtrace is for > C-c C-p C-p, not for C-c C-p C-d. yes indeed, sorry.

[Bug-AUCTeX] preview-1.248; preview completely broken?

2005-04-26 Thread Richard Lewis
> Remember to cover the basics. Including a minimal LaTeX example > file exhibiting the problem might help. preview used to work fine, but now i get the following error/backtrace (on any LaTeX document, eg \documentclass{article} \begin{document} $\alpha$ \end{document} of course AUCTeX can c

[Bug-AUCTeX] Re: preview-1.248; preview completely broken?

2005-04-26 Thread David Kastrup
Richard Lewis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Remember to cover the basics. Including a minimal LaTeX example >> file exhibiting the problem might help. > > preview used to work fine, but now i get the following error/backtrace > (on any LaTeX document, eg > > \documentclass{article} > > \begin{do