Ikumi Keita writes:
> This looks good to me. It takes care of all possible difficulties I
> worried. :-)
What, maximum score? ;-) I installed the change incl. a test with commit
de6aa05d7 and closing this report. Many thanks for your comments.
Best, Arash
Hi Arash,
> Arash Esbati writes:
> Following up myself, I was thinking about something like in the attached
> patch. Any comments welcome.
This looks good to me. It takes care of all possible difficulties I
worried. :-)
Bye,
Ikumi Keita
#StandWithUkraine #StopWarInUkraine
Arash Esbati writes:
> My simple idea was to have an extra check at the end of `texmathp'
> itself in terms of: Pass the possible point for math-on to
> `LaTeX-verbatim-p' and see what it returs.
Following up myself, I was thinking about something like in the attached
patch. Any comments
Ikumi Keita writes:
> Looking at the current code closely, I think we can take a more drastic
> route. :-)
That's always highly welcome :-)
> Thus it's safe to modify `LaTeX-verbatim-p' to return nil at just before
> "\verb|...|" etc. by the following reasons:
> o In
