bug#62220: In-buffer completion and LaTeX-math-cal

2023-03-18 Thread Arash Esbati
Ikumi Keita writes: > Ah, indeed. Sorry for my poor memory.  No worries, the upside is that you always look after what I do  Best, Arash ___ bug-auctex mailing list bug-auctex@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-auctex

bug#62220: In-buffer completion and LaTeX-math-cal

2023-03-18 Thread Ikumi Keita
Hi Arash, > Arash Esbati writes: > We require seq in tex.el[1]. Isn't that sufficient or am I missing > something? I vaguely remember we did that as I added `seq-concatenate' > to array.el. I don't have an older Emacs installed here so I can't test > it right now. Ah, indeed. Sorry for

bug#62220: In-buffer completion and LaTeX-math-cal

2023-03-18 Thread Arash Esbati
Hi Keita, Ikumi Keita writes: > I'm afraid that we still need autoload declaration for seq-filter for > compatibility with older emacsen. We require seq in tex.el[1]. Isn't that sufficient or am I missing something? I vaguely remember we did that as I added `seq-concatenate' to array.el. I