Re: [Bug-AUCTeX] 11.81; help needed with font-latex-user-keyword-classes

2005-10-20 Thread Patrick Drechsler
Sorry for the late reply! Ralf Angeli wrote on 18 Oct 2005 10:47:39 MET: > * Patrick Drechsler (2005-10-18) writes: > >> Ralf Angeli wrote on 15 Oct 2005 11:24:14 MET: >> >> JFTR: A related minor problem is that Emacs' >> parenthesis-matching will mark the closing `\)' as incorrect > > I've sent

Re: [Bug-AUCTeX] 11.81; help needed with font-latex-user-keyword-classes

2005-10-18 Thread Ralf Angeli
* Patrick Drechsler (2005-10-18) writes: > Ralf Angeli wrote on 15 Oct 2005 11:24:14 MET: > >> As a workaround you can write >> >> \(P=\Sexpr{b$p.value}\) >> >> instead of >> >> $P=\Sexpr{b$p.value}$ > > JFTR: A related minor problem is that Emacs' parenthesis-matching > will mark the closing

Re: [Bug-AUCTeX] 11.81; help needed with font-latex-user-keyword-classes

2005-10-17 Thread Patrick Drechsler
Ralf Angeli wrote on 15 Oct 2005 11:24:14 MET: > As a workaround you can write > > \(P=\Sexpr{b$p.value}\) > > instead of > > $P=\Sexpr{b$p.value}$ JFTR: A related minor problem is that Emacs' parenthesis-matching will mark the closing `\)' as incorrect and all follow-up parenthesis matching

Re: [Bug-AUCTeX] 11.81; help needed with font-latex-user-keyword-classes

2005-10-15 Thread Ralf Angeli
David Kastrup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Ralf Angeli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> A remedy for the problem with $...$ could be to fontify this by >> means of keyword fontification as well. But I am afraid that this >> will slow down font locking dramatically. > > Is there some way of bench

Re: [Bug-AUCTeX] 11.81; help needed with font-latex-user-keyword-classes

2005-10-15 Thread David Kastrup
Ralf Angeli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Now why is "\(P=\Sexpr{b$p.value}\)" working? The \(...\) pair is not > fontified syntactically but by means of keywords. And fontification > of keywords happens after the syntactic pass. That means syntactic > fontification can take care of the \Sexpr

Re: [Bug-AUCTeX] 11.81; help needed with font-latex-user-keyword-classes

2005-10-15 Thread Patrick Drechsler
Ralf Angeli wrote on 15 Oct 2005 11:24:14 MET: > * Patrick Drechsler (2005-10-15) writes: > >> Ralf Angeli wrote on 14 Oct 2005 08:56:11 MET: >> >>> * Patrick Drechsler (2005-10-13) writes: >>> I was wondering if somebody could help me suppress syntax highlighting of the math environmen

Re: [Bug-AUCTeX] 11.81; help needed with font-latex-user-keyword-classes

2005-10-15 Thread Ralf Angeli
* Patrick Drechsler (2005-10-15) writes: > I'm not sure if my last reply was sent, so forgive me if it's > posted twice. It was sent. But to me only. > Ralf Angeli wrote on 14 Oct 2005 08:56:11 MET: > >> * Patrick Drechsler (2005-10-13) writes: >> >>> I was wondering if somebody could help me s

Re: [Bug-AUCTeX] 11.81; help needed with font-latex-user-keyword-classes

2005-10-14 Thread Patrick Drechsler
I'm not sure if my last reply was sent, so forgive me if it's posted twice. Ralf Angeli wrote on 14 Oct 2005 08:56:11 MET: > * Patrick Drechsler (2005-10-13) writes: > >> I was wondering if somebody could help me suppress syntax >> highlighting of the math environment within a certain macro? > [.

Re: [Bug-AUCTeX] 11.81; help needed with font-latex-user-keyword-classes

2005-10-14 Thread Ralf Angeli
* Patrick Drechsler (2005-10-13) writes: > I was wondering if somebody could help me suppress syntax > highlighting of the math environment within a certain macro? [...] > Here is the value: \Sexpr{b$p.value} some more text. I'd add this macro to `LaTeX-verbatim-macros-with-braces'. -- Ralf _

[Bug-AUCTeX] 11.81; help needed with font-latex-user-keyword-classes

2005-10-13 Thread Patrick Drechsler
Remember to cover the basics, that is, what you expected to happen and what in fact did happen. Be sure to consult the FAQ section in the manual before submitting a bug report. If the bug (or problem) is triggered by a specific (La)TeX file, you should try to produce a minimal sample file showin