Re: [Bug-AUCTeX] 2013-10-14; highlighting of \cite[] commands

2014-07-23 Thread emacs user
works, brilliant, thanks so much...! E On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 2:00 PM, Tassilo Horn wrote: > emacs user writes: > > Hi! > > > Hello, I switched to using the elpa package (auctex-11.87.5) and its > > seems that this problem is back there. could it be that this patch > > didn't make it to the

Re: [Bug-AUCTeX] 2013-10-14; highlighting of \cite[] commands

2014-07-22 Thread Tassilo Horn
emacs user writes: Hi! > Hello, I switched to using the elpa package (auctex-11.87.5) and its > seems that this problem is back there. could it be that this patch > didn't make it to the most recent distribution, or perhaps I am doing > something wrong...? The patch hadn't been applied to the

Re: [Bug-AUCTeX] 2013-10-14; highlighting of \cite[] commands

2014-07-22 Thread emacs user
emacs user writes: > perfect now, thanks! > > On Sun, Nov 10, 2013 at 4:07 PM, Ralf Angeli wrote: > > Hi, many thanks for your patience, and I hope all this is not due to > > some mistake I am making. > I doubt it.  Still, it's bewildering that the same regular expression > matches different s

Re: [Bug-AUCTeX] 2013-10-14; highlighting of \cite[] commands

2013-11-10 Thread emacs user
perfect now, thanks! On Sun, Nov 10, 2013 at 4:07 PM, Ralf Angeli wrote: > * emacs user (2013-11-10) writes: > > > Hi, many thanks for your patience, and I hope all this is not due to some > > mistake I am making. > > I doubt it. Still, it's bewildering that the same regular expression > match

Re: [Bug-AUCTeX] 2013-10-14; highlighting of \cite[] commands

2013-11-10 Thread Ralf Angeli
* emacs user (2013-11-10) writes: > Hi, many thanks for your patience, and I hope all this is not due to some > mistake I am making. I doubt it. Still, it's bewildering that the same regular expression matches different strings in my and in your case. > In any case, the first expression leads t

Re: [Bug-AUCTeX] 2013-10-14; highlighting of \cite[] commands

2013-11-10 Thread emacs user
Hi, many thanks for your patience, and I hope all this is not due to some mistake I am making. In any case, the first expression leads to the point moving to the end of the second \citep, while the second expression moves the point to the end of the first \citep. In both cases I run a bare emacs

Re: [Bug-AUCTeX] 2013-10-14; highlighting of \cite[] commands

2013-11-10 Thread Ralf Angeli
* emacs user (2013-11-09) writes: > closing brace of the second one Strange. I've stripped some stuff from the code which should not be relevant for the case at hand. Does the following code also make point end up behind the second closing brace? (re-search-forward "cite[A-Za-z]*\\(\\[.*\\

Re: [Bug-AUCTeX] 2013-10-14; highlighting of \cite[] commands

2013-11-09 Thread emacs user
closing brace of the second one On Sat, Nov 9, 2013 at 10:48 PM, Ralf Angeli wrote: > * emacs user (2013-11-09) writes: > > > hi all, thanks for the prompt response. here is a complete reproducible > > example. > > Thanks a lot for the recipe. > > > the problem occurs only when the house is ov

Re: [Bug-AUCTeX] 2013-10-14; highlighting of \cite[] commands

2013-11-09 Thread Ralf Angeli
* emacs user (2013-11-09) writes: > hi all, thanks for the prompt response. here is a complete reproducible > example. Thanks a lot for the recipe. > the problem occurs only when the house is over the \citep commands and the > text between them. Please let me know if there is anything else I c

Re: [Bug-AUCTeX] 2013-10-14; highlighting of \cite[] commands

2013-11-09 Thread emacs user
hi all, thanks for the prompt response. here is a complete reproducible example. I use: /Applications/Emacs.app/Contents/MacOS/Emacs -geometry 80x30 --load ~/.emacs.d/Hacking/.emacs-debug-auctex -Q test.tex I am attaching the files .emacs-debug-auctex and test.tex below. the problem occurs only

Re: [Bug-AUCTeX] 2013-10-14; highlighting of \cite[] commands

2013-11-08 Thread David Kastrup
Ralf Angeli writes: > * emacs user (2013-11-08) writes: > >> I find that when I move the mouse over a text such as >> >> Blah blah asdf asdf \citep[e.g.,][]{first-ref}. Blah blah asdf asdf >> \citep[e.g.,][]{second-ref}. Blah blah more. >> >> The green highlighting starts with the first \citep

Re: [Bug-AUCTeX] 2013-10-14; highlighting of \cite[] commands

2013-11-08 Thread Ralf Angeli
* emacs user (2013-11-08) writes: > I find that when I move the mouse over a text such as > > Blah blah asdf asdf \citep[e.g.,][]{first-ref}. Blah blah asdf asdf > \citep[e.g.,][]{second-ref}. Blah blah more. > > The green highlighting starts with the first \citep and ends only at the } > of the

Re: [Bug-AUCTeX] 2013-10-14; highlighting of \cite[] commands

2013-11-08 Thread Tassilo Horn
emacs user writes: > I find that when I move the mouse over a text such as > > Blah blah asdf asdf \citep[e.g.,][]{first-ref}. Blah blah asdf asdf > \citep[e.g.,][]{second-ref}. Blah blah more. > > The green highlighting starts with the first \citep and ends only at the } > of the *second* \cit

[Bug-AUCTeX] 2013-10-14; highlighting of \cite[] commands

2013-11-08 Thread emacs user
Dear AucTeX friends, I find that when I move the mouse over a text such as Blah blah asdf asdf \citep[e.g.,][]{first-ref}. Blah blah asdf asdf \citep[e.g.,][]{second-ref}. Blah blah more. The green highlighting starts with the first \citep and ends only at the } of the *second* \citep, highlig