Ikumi Keita writes:
> This looks good to me. It takes care of all possible difficulties I
> worried. :-)
What, maximum score? ;-) I installed the change incl. a test with commit
de6aa05d7 and closing this report. Many thanks for your comments.
Best, Arash
___
Hi Arash,
> Arash Esbati writes:
> Following up myself, I was thinking about something like in the attached
> patch. Any comments welcome.
This looks good to me. It takes care of all possible difficulties I
worried. :-)
Bye,
Ikumi Keita
#StandWithUkraine #StopWarInUkraine
_
Arash Esbati writes:
> My simple idea was to have an extra check at the end of `texmathp'
> itself in terms of: Pass the possible point for math-on to
> `LaTeX-verbatim-p' and see what it returs.
Following up myself, I was thinking about something like in the attached
patch. Any comments welcom
Hi Keita,
Ikumi Keita writes:
> Yes. As far as I can see, texmathp.el doesn't pay attention to verbatim
> constructs at all. I think that's an intention of Carsten Dominik.
Thanks for confirming. I'm not sure about the intention behind it, but
I think we should if we can fix this issue.
> May
Hi Arash,
> Arash Esbati writes:
> texmathp ignores the verb macro completely. The similar scenario can be
> created for a verbatim-like environment. Can others reproduce this?
Yes. As far as I can see, texmathp.el doesn't pay attention to verbatim
constructs at all. I think that's an inte
Hi all,
please consider this small example:
--8<---cut here---start->8---
\documentclass{article}
\begin{document}
text \verb|$|
\end{document}
%%% Local Variables:
%%% mode: latex
%%% TeX-master: t
%%% End:
--8<---cut here---end
