Hi Janet,
> Janet Chen writes:
> Dear Ikumi,
> Thanks very much!
>> I installed a fix in the git repo, so you won't need the workaround
>> under the next AUCTeX release.
>>
>> I'll close this bug.
I'm sorry to deliver you a bad news. In response to bug#69254[1], we
decided to revert the
Hi Janet,
> Janet Chen writes:
> Dear Ikumi,
> This works for me; thank you!
I installed a fix in the git repo, so you won't need the workaround
under the next AUCTeX release.
I'll close this bug.
> On Thu, Sep 7, 2023 at 5:56 AM Ikumi Keita wrote:
>>
>> For a tentative workaround, add
> "Tassilo Horn" writes:
> Hi Keita,
> Am Sa, 9. Sep 2023, um 09:03, schrieb Ikumi Keita:
>> Attached is the current proposal for latex-mode for setups of
>> variables involving sections, paragraphs and indentations. At first I
>> thought to have locally-bound test for paragraphs and
Hi Keita,
Am Sa, 9. Sep 2023, um 09:03, schrieb Ikumi Keita:
> Attached is the current proposal for latex-mode for setups of
> variables involving sections, paragraphs and indentations. At first I
> thought to have locally-bound test for paragraphs and indentations as
> well, but concluded that I
Hi Tassilo,
> Tassilo Horn writes:
> Oh, yes, that looks like a proper approach to tackle that problem.
Attached is the current proposal for latex-mode for setups of
variables involving sections, paragraphs and indentations. At first I
thought to have locally-bound test for paragraphs and
Ikumi Keita writes:
>> That sounds reasonable in the current case. OTOH, it could be that
>> users set things like outline-regexp in those mode-hooks which would
>> then be overridden by our set-up code if that ran after the hooks...
>
> Hmm, how about adding locally-bound test like this?
>
Hi Tassilo,
> Tassilo Horn writes:
> That sounds reasonable in the current case. OTOH, it could be that
> users set things like outline-regexp in those mode-hooks which would
> then be overridden by our set-up code if that ran after the hooks...
Hmm, how about adding locally-bound test
Dear Ikumi,
This works for me; thank you!
Best,
Janet
On Thu, Sep 7, 2023 at 5:56 AM Ikumi Keita wrote:
> Hi Janet,
>
> > Janet Chen writes:
> > I've added a custom section to LaTeX-section-list, but
> LaTeX-mark-section ignores it. This may be the intended behavior, but I
> think it
Ikumi Keita writes:
> To developers:
> `LaTeX-common-initialization' sets up some variables including
> `outline-regexp' and `outline-heading-alist' before `run-mode-hooks',
> which is responsible for parsing and applying the file local variables.
> Shouldn't we move such set-up codes after
Hi Janet,
> Janet Chen writes:
> I've added a custom section to LaTeX-section-list, but LaTeX-mark-section
> ignores it. This may be the intended behavior, but I think it would make more
> sense for it to mark sections based on the entries in LaTeX-section-list.
> In case it matters,
I've added a custom section to LaTeX-section-list, but LaTeX-mark-section
ignores it. This may be the intended behavior, but I think it would make more
sense for it to mark sections based on the entries in LaTeX-section-list.
In case it matters, here's the buffer local value of my
11 matches
Mail list logo
