Re: FreeBSD, autom4te and locking on NFS

2006-05-10 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
>>> "RW" == Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [...] >> > - BTW, is there real-world indication of build tools other than >> > Automake-created Makefiles that may happen to invoke parallel autom4te >> > instances, possibly indirectly? I think you can configure autom4te (with "~/.

Re: AC_HEADER_STDBOOL rejects valid C99 implementation

2006-05-10 Thread Bruno Haible
Paul Eggert wrote: > > So, _Bool and bool are _not_ integer types. > > No, because ISO C99 section 6.2.5 paragraph 6 says: > > The type _Bool and the unsigned integer types that correspond to the > standard signed integer types are the _standard unsigned integer types_. You're right. I overloo

Re: AC_HEADER_STDBOOL rejects valid C99 implementation

2006-05-10 Thread Paul Eggert
Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > ISO C 99, section 6.2.5 paragraph 17, defines the term "integer types": > > The type char, the signed and unsigned integer types, and the enumerated > types are collectively called integer types. > > So, _Bool and bool are _not_ integer types. No

Re: "mktemp" is a BSD-ism and there are others around....

2006-05-10 Thread Paul Eggert
Bruce Korb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes on 2005-10-30: > The other variation on "mktemp" uses "illegal option" > (you get arrested if you use one). BTW, if the "mktemp -d -q" > is successful in creating a file, shouldn't you remove the > file before trying another method? Sorry, I don't follow the