Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.59d] testsuite: 202 failed

2006-05-17 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Paul Eggert wrote on Wed, May 17, 2006 at 07:37:18PM CEST: > Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > The config.status "special magic" from this patch: > > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/autoconf-patches/2006-05/msg00041.html > > doesn't work if we don't also use a program with an a

Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.59d] testsuite: 202 failed

2006-05-17 Thread Paul Eggert
Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The config.status "special magic" from this patch: > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/autoconf-patches/2006-05/msg00041.html > doesn't work if we don't also use a program with an absolute name. What's the bug with it? Sorry, I don't follow. > OK to

Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.59d] testsuite: 202 failed

2006-05-17 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hi Ralf, * Ralf Menzel wrote on Wed, May 17, 2006 at 02:12:01PM CEST: > > the latest patches related to mkdir seem to cause problems with > /usr/bin/mkdir of SolarisĀ 9. Thanks for the bug report! Meanwhile, I found another, more serious issue with AC_PROG_MKDIR_P: The config.status "special mag

Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.59d] testsuite: 202 failed

2006-05-17 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Argh, for this description to be correct... * Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Wed, May 17, 2006 at 02:40:09PM CEST: > > Note I don't bother to search all of PATH for a suitable mkdir -- > I don't think people go to lenghts to install GNU coreutils mkdir and > then put it late in the PATH. ...it needs t

[GNU Autoconf 2.59d] testsuite: 202 failed

2006-05-17 Thread Ralf Menzel
Hi, the latest patches related to mkdir seem to cause problems with /usr/bin/mkdir of SolarisĀ 9. I attach the log of the testsuite. Tell me how I can help. Bye, Ralf Menzel testsuite.log Description: tests/testsuite.log