According to Daily, Jeff A on 2/6/2010 3:22 PM:
> The AC_TYPE_INT*_T macros worked for me with 2.64, but now they don't with
> 2.65.
This is a known regression, fixed here:
http://git.sv.gnu.org/cgit/autoconf.git/commit/?id=83ee5bc4
I hope to release autoconf 2.66 before the end of this month, w
The AC_TYPE_INT*_T macros worked for me with 2.64, but now they don't with
2.65. The AC_TYPE_UINT*_T macros still work. I have verified that reverting
back to 2.64 does work for me. I don't have the output of make check to
provide, but I do have the output from my config.log for my software w
At Saturday 06 February 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> Hello Stefano,
Hello Ralf. Thanks for your quick answer.
> * Stefano Lattarini wrote on Sat, Feb 06, 2010 at 04:14:45PM CET:
> > I encountered the following strage behaviour in the latest stable
> > autoconf (2.65, Debian package version 2.6
Hello Stefano,
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Sat, Feb 06, 2010 at 04:14:45PM CET:
> I encountered the following strage behaviour in the latest stable
> autoconf (2.65, Debian package version 2.65-2), and it really seems
> a bug to me:
Of the AC_PROG_{CC,CXX,F77,FC} macros, only the first one in t
Hello everybody.
I encountered the following strage behaviour in the latest stable
autoconf (2.65, Debian package version 2.65-2), and it really seems
a bug to me:
$ cat > configure.ac < configure.ac <
According to Niels Lohmann on 2/5/2010 3:50 AM:
> This all works, but if (by accident), a check in configure.ac is deleted, say
> than one for WGET, then tests/package.m4 ends up with an unresolved
> substitution:
>
> m4_define([WGET], [...@wget@])
Yes, any attempt to expand WGET in m4 at
Hello Niels,
* Niels Lohmann wrote on Fri, Feb 05, 2010 at 11:50:10AM CET:
> we have a project where we use the configure script to search for some
> helper tools and write the paths to the package.m4 for the autotest
> test suite. We do this with
>
> configure.ac:
> AC_PATH_PROGS(WGET, [wg
Hello Vincent,
thanks for the report.
* Vincent Lefevre wrote on Fri, Feb 05, 2010 at 02:51:25PM CET:
> I can reproduce it under Mac OS X (with autoconf 2.65).
>
> Note that this is a regression. On a Debian/stable (lenny) machine
> with autoconf 2.61-8, there is no such problem.
[...]
> On 2010
