Re: bug in autoconf-2.64

2011-02-22 Thread Peter O'Gorman
On 02/22/2011 04:04 PM, Eric Blake wrote: [adding bug-m4] On 02/22/2011 01:38 PM, Mike Stump wrote: On Feb 22, 2011, at 11:00 AM, Eric Blake wrote: Hmm, can you point to a URL of the web archive of that thread, to see if I can glean anything from that discussion? http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-pa

Re: bug in autoconf-2.64

2011-02-22 Thread Mike Stump
On Feb 22, 2011, at 2:04 PM, Eric Blake wrote: > If the problem is reliably caused by the version of m4, then can you do > a git bisect on m4 sources to pinpoint a particular m4 revision where > the problem first appears? It is, but no, I'm kinda tied up with work right now, so I can't commit to

Re: bug in autoconf-2.64

2011-02-22 Thread Eric Blake
[adding bug-m4] On 02/22/2011 01:38 PM, Mike Stump wrote: > On Feb 22, 2011, at 11:00 AM, Eric Blake wrote: >> Hmm, can you point to a URL of the web archive of that thread, to see if >> I can glean anything from that discussion? > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-02/msg01393.html Accord

Re: bug in autoconf-2.64

2011-02-22 Thread Mike Stump
On Feb 22, 2011, at 11:00 AM, Eric Blake wrote: > Hmm, can you point to a URL of the web archive of that thread, to see if > I can glean anything from that discussion? http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-02/msg01393.html

Re: bug in autoconf-2.64

2011-02-22 Thread Eric Blake
On 02/22/2011 11:43 AM, Mike Stump wrote: >> Oh, you could have mentioned that you were trying to run autoconf on gcc >> to begin with! Indeed, regenerating configure files for gcc requires >> some specific steps; but those steps are better documented by asking on >> the gcc lists rather than here

Re: bug in autoconf-2.64

2011-02-22 Thread Mike Stump
On Feb 22, 2011, at 6:13 AM, Eric Blake wrote: > On 02/22/2011 03:49 AM, Mike Stump wrote: >> I'm trying to run autoconf on darwin, and it requires autoconf-2.64. > > Have you tried with autoconf 2.68? No... [ pause ] I ripped out the require lines and tried with 2.68, same issue. > If you want

Re: bug in autoconf-2.64

2011-02-22 Thread Eric Blake
On 02/22/2011 03:49 AM, Mike Stump wrote: > I'm trying to run autoconf on darwin, and it requires autoconf-2.64. Have you tried with autoconf 2.68? > When I run it I wind up with extra lines in the resulting configure file: > > Index: configure >

bug in autoconf-2.64

2011-02-22 Thread Mike Stump
I'm trying to run autoconf on darwin, and it requires autoconf-2.64. When I run it I wind up with extra lines in the resulting configure file: Index: configure === --- configure (revision 170335) +++ configure (working copy) @@