[ this is http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.sysutils.autoconf.bugs/7834
from http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-02/msg01480.html
adding bug-gnulib; followups can elide bug-autoconf ]
* Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 07:24:35AM CET:
> IOW, it looks like the replacement code
* Mike Stump wrote on Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 12:06:07AM CET:
> On Feb 23, 2011, at 1:37 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
> > Are you on a machine with SSE4.2 instructions?
>
> Core 2 Duo. darwin10 (aka SnowLeopard). No glibc.
Here no SSE4.2 either. In an up to date build tree of the commit that
exposes the
On Feb 23, 2011, at 1:37 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
> Are you on a machine with SSE4.2 instructions?
Core 2 Duo. darwin10 (aka SnowLeopard). No glibc.
On 02/23/2011 02:33 PM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> * Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 09:08:07PM CET:
>> I can confirm the issue, but my bisect ended at
>> 5e763da323f3927159b6c151f186569a9929ddbe instead.
>
>> I'm starting bisect over the gnulib update in above commit now,
>> which ran
* Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 09:08:07PM CET:
> I can confirm the issue, but my bisect ended at
> 5e763da323f3927159b6c151f186569a9929ddbe instead.
> I'm starting bisect over the gnulib update in above commit now,
> which ranges from c0ebdfe226c38c72db7c1944113fd19ff534e362 to
>
Hello,
* Peter O'Gorman wrote on Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 04:50:32AM CET:
> Unless I did it wrong (entirely possible) -
> 76d1c49b8056aaf3f1046ba19c6dea6eb6aecb78 is the first bad commit -
I can confirm the issue, but my bisect ended at
5e763da323f3927159b6c151f186569a9929ddbe instead.
(You need to u
