[GNU Autoconf 2.68b] testsuite: 84 failed

' and 084-debug.tar.gz is from a run with gmake -C tests check CONFIG_SHELL='/bin/ksh -x' TESTSUITEFLAGS='-v -d -x 84' Nothing is jumping out at me right now but then with guests here for the weekend, I'm not really in debugging mode right now. -- Tim RiceMultitalents

Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.68b] testsuite: 84 failed

tests were skipped. .. Thanks. -- Tim RiceMultitalents(707) 456-1146 t...@multitalents.net (707) 887-1469

Re: Issues with automatic re-execution of configure with CONFIG_SHELL (was: Re: autoconf-2.68b released [beta])

for master? Your 0001-configure-don-t-infloop-when-re-executing-with-CONFI.patch allows test 75 to pass on UnixWare. Thanks, -- Tim RiceMultitalents t...@multitalents.net

autoconf-2.68b/tests/m4sh.at

systems like FAT tend to fake executable permissions on all files. -- Tim RiceMultitalents(707) 456-1146 t...@multitalents.net (707) 887-1469

Re: autoconf-2.68b released [beta]

: env CONFIG_SHELL=./cfg-sh ./configure ... I'll try to do some more debugging in a couple of days. -- Tim RiceMultitalents t...@multitalents.net

Re: autoconf-2.65 on UnixWare 7.1.4

On Sun, 24 Jan 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: * Tim Rice wrote on Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 07:17:52PM CET: On Sat, 16 Jan 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: * Tim Rice wrote on Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 01:48:43AM CET: iASBOX .. I've seen this before back in autoconf-2.59

Re: autoconf-2.65 on UnixWare 7.1.4

On Sat, 16 Jan 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: Hi Tim, * Tim Rice wrote on Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 03:28:49AM CET: On Tue, 12 Jan 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: * Tim Rice wrote on Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 01:48:43AM CET: I have built one here and test 127 does pass with CONFIG_SHELL=/opt

Re: autoconf-2.65 on UnixWare 7.1.4

On Mon, 18 Jan 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: * Tim Rice wrote on Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 07:17:52PM CET: On Sat, 16 Jan 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: * Tim Rice wrote on Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 03:28:49AM CET: The bash I built back in 2006 was version 3.1.17(1)-release With that we get

Re: autoconf-2.65 on UnixWare 7.1.4

On Tue, 12 Jan 2010, Tim Rice wrote: Hi Ralf, On Tue, 12 Jan 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: * Tim Rice wrote on Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 01:48:43AM CET: On Mon, 11 Jan 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: [snip] 1. micro-suite.at:2: 1. pass: no trailing newline (micro-suite.at:2

Re: autoconf-2.65 on UnixWare 7.1.4

Hi Ralf, On Tue, 12 Jan 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: * Tim Rice wrote on Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 01:48:43AM CET: On Mon, 11 Jan 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: [snip] 1. micro-suite.at:2: 1. pass: no trailing newline (micro-suite.at:2): FAILED (micro-suite.at:3) 127. autotest.at

Re: autoconf-2.65 on UnixWare 7.1.4

]) # _AS_CLEAN_DIR(DIR) . Thanks, Ralf Thanks for all your help on this. -- Tim RiceMultitalents(707) 887-1469 t...@multitalents.net #! /bin/ksh # Generated by configure. # Run this file to recreate the current configuration. # Compiler output produced

autoconf-2.64 on UnixWare 7.1.4

of testsuite.dir from running env TESTSUITEFLAGS='-v -d -x 30 121 271 272 273 274 277' gmake -e check -- Tim RiceMultitalents(707) 887-1469 t...@multitalents.net testsuite.log.gz Description: application/gunzip

Re: Autoconf 2.60a on UnixWare 7.1.4

On Tue, 12 Sep 2006, Paul Eggert wrote: Tim Rice [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: So I tried this patch (on a fresh tree). Tests passed. That's really weird. It depends on the spelling of _ASEOF? Wow. I just now undid the change to the documentation, since my guess apparently

Re: Autoconf 2.60a on UnixWare 7.1.4

On Mon, 11 Sep 2006, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: * Tim Rice wrote on Mon, Sep 11, 2006 at 03:35:11AM CEST: I got an opportunity to test 2.60a on UnixWare 7.1.4. snip from test 168's config.status --- # Find out whether ``test -x'' works. Don't use a zero-byte file

Re: Autoconf 2.60a on UnixWare 7.1.4

On Sun, 10 Sep 2006, Paul Eggert wrote: Tim Rice [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I have no idea why SESEOF is there instead of _ASEOF It's probably some bug in the Unixware shell. You might be able to use the truss command to verify this. If we knew more about the bug, we might be able

Re: 2.59d on OpenServer

obvious that it has to wait after the release. Bnd I do not think any quick actioon is neeeded rigt now. Post release is fine with me. Stepan -- Tim RiceMultitalents(707) 887-1469 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: 2.59d on OpenServer

On Tue, 6 Jun 2006, Paul Eggert wrote: Tim Rice [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: OSR5 didn't have /usr/bin/posix/sh so there wasn't and backward compatability reasson to use the older ksh. This is a regression, then, and it was caused by the patch to m4sh.m4 described here: http

Re: non portable sed scripts

/Pacific, ran autoconf in the coreutils source tree, ran configure on my 7.1.1 box. This time it worked fine. Good work. -- Tim RiceMultitalents(707) 887-1469 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: non portable sed scripts

on autoconf-2.59c as it was already 3. -ac_max_sed_lines=m4_eval(_AC_SED_CMD_LIMIT - 4) +ac_max_sed_lines=m4_eval(_AC_SED_CMD_LIMIT - 3) -- Tim RiceMultitalents(707) 887-1469 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: non portable sed scripts

record limit of 5K And the awk string limit -- 401 limit in OSR5, 5K limit in UW7. -- Tim RiceMultitalents(707) 887-1469 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

patch (packages building outside of source tree)

: *** [distclean-recursive] Error 1 .. With the attached patch, the problem goes away. -- Tim RiceMultitalents(707) 887-1469 [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- automake-1.9.6/lib/am/subdirs.am.old 2005-05-14 13:21:06.0 -0700 +++ automake-1.9.6/lib/am/subdirs.am

patch (CC -c -o)

Some CC compilers do not like -c -o options together. The attached patch fixes this. You get .cpp.o: $(CXXCOMPILE) -c $ instead of .cpp.o: $(CXXCOMPILE) -c -o $@ $ -- Tim RiceMultitalents(707) 887-1469 [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- automake-1.9.6

Re: patch (packages building outside of source tree)

On Sun, 30 Oct 2005, Paul Eggert wrote: This patch (as well as the CC -c -o patch) are for automake, not autoconf, so could you please report them to bug-automake instead? Thanks. Opps, grep'd for bugs in the sources and pasted the wrong one into e-mail. Sorry. -- Tim Rice