On 10/01/2010 10:35 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
That assumes, of course, that I can easily fix the regression of
AS_PUSH_VAR accepting a var-name with = in it ;) It may not be today,
but it's certainly on my list of things to tackle during the first week
of October.
Oops - it's the 8th; I missed my
On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 18:35, Eric Blake ebl...@redhat.com wrote:
On 10/01/2010 10:03 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
I think the correct answer is do whatever it has been doing until
2.67. :) And the testsuite should be updated to have the appropriate
coverage, and I want a pony.
I can't promise
On 09/27/2010 07:46 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
I was able to reduce the problem
to the following trivial case:
--8--cut here--8--
AC_DEFUN([MY_MACRO],
[AS_VAR_PUSHDEF([VAR],[prefix_$1])
dnl This is the version used by AX_CFLAGS_GCC_OPTION.
dnl I
On 10/01/2010 06:51 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 09/27/2010 07:46 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
I was able to reduce the problem
to the following trivial case:
--8--cut here--8--
AC_DEFUN([MY_MACRO],
[AS_VAR_PUSHDEF([VAR],[prefix_$1])
dnl This is the
On 10/01/2010 09:07 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 10/01/2010 03:57 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
Either way, the name of the indirect variable being assigned is
$prefix_a_b, whether you use pre- or post-2.67. Why is 'a=b' being
passed instead of 'a_b' in the first place? I'd need to see more
context of
On 10/01/2010 05:11 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
On 10/01/2010 09:07 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 10/01/2010 03:57 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
Either way, the name of the indirect variable being assigned is
$prefix_a_b, whether you use pre- or post-2.67. Why is 'a=b' being
passed instead of 'a_b' in the
On 10/01/2010 10:03 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
I think the correct answer is do whatever it has been doing until
2.67. :) And the testsuite should be updated to have the appropriate
coverage, and I want a pony.
I can't promise the pony :) But given the arguments that have been
raised on this
Paolo Bonzini bonz...@gnu.org writes:
On 10/01/2010 03:57 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
Either way, the name of the indirect variable being assigned is
$prefix_a_b, whether you use pre- or post-2.67. Why is 'a=b' being
passed instead of 'a_b' in the first place? I'd need to see more
context of
On 09/25/2010 12:22 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
retitle 593838 AX_CFLAGS_GCC_OPTION misuses AS_VAR_PUSHDEF variable
reassign 593838 autoconf-archive
thanks
Jerome BENOITjgm...@rezozer.net initially reported that
AX_CFLAGS_GCC_OPTION(-std=c99) fails with Autoconf 2.67. Vincent
Bernatber...@debian.org
