Re: CRLF vs. LF and config.status defines

Karl Berry wrote: I.e., autoconf is not supported on CRLF filesystems I'd say that's probably correct, yes. CRLF is a pain to port to.

CRLF vs. LF and config.status defines

Hi everyone - Graham (cc'd) checked out the TeX Live source code on a Windows system, using a mingw64 and msys environment. The autoconf files were generated with (the original, unpatched) autoconf 2.69. The TL configure failed, because the defines[.awk] file created by config.status has a match