Re: autoconf: undocumented limitation

2009-04-10 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Andreas Schwab wrote on Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 12:06:55PM CEST: > Ralf Wildenhues writes: > > +HP-UX 11.00 and IRIX 6.5 Awk require than input files have a line length > > +of at most 3070 bytes. > > s/than/that/ * Eric Blake wrote on Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 02:39:04PM CEST: > According to Ralf Wil

Re: autoconf: undocumented limitation

2009-04-10 Thread Eric Blake
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 According to Ralf Wildenhues on 4/10/2009 2:09 AM: > > OK to push? Yes, after fixing nits (see also Andreas' review). > --- a/doc/autoconf.texi > +++ b/doc/autoconf.texi > @@ -2155,7 +2155,8 @@ for more details. > > The @var{inputs} may be absolu

Re: autoconf: undocumented limitation

2009-04-10 Thread Andreas Schwab
Ralf Wildenhues writes: > @@ -16367,6 +16368,9 @@ The original version of Awk had a limit of at most 99 > bytes per > per run of non-special characters in a @code{printf} format, but these > bugs have been fixed on all practical hosts that we know of. > > +HP-UX 11.00 and IRIX 6.5 Awk requir

Re: autoconf: undocumented limitation

2009-04-10 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 10:09:08AM CEST: > > BTW, the Automake 1.10b has a new chapter "Length Limitations" > addressing slightly related issues for the Makefile.am author. Never mind this comment. I'm going for more coffee now. (The chapter is about the command line leng

Re: autoconf: undocumented limitation

2009-04-10 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hello Bruno, Eric, * Eric Blake wrote on Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 02:10:27PM CEST: > According to Bruno Haible on 4/6/2009 4:00 AM: > > Please say that the line length is limited. But what is LINE_MAX? 2K minus a couple of bytes is probably a safe value. > > If you > > mean LINE_MAX from [1], then

Re: autoconf: undocumented limitation

2009-04-06 Thread Eric Blake
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 According to Bruno Haible on 4/6/2009 4:00 AM: >> If the >> latter, then no, I don't think we should document that. We should just >> document that config.status works only on text files, i.e., the line >> length is limited to LINE_MAX > > Saying on

Re: autoconf: undocumented limitation

2009-04-06 Thread Bruno Haible
Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > Are you complaining that the limitation of 'awk' is not documented, or > that the limitation of 'config.status' is not documented? Actually, both. The limitation of 'awk' can be documented in section "Limitations of Usual Tools", and the limitation about config.status shou

Re: autoconf: undocumented limitation

2009-04-05 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hello Bruno, * Bruno Haible wrote on Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 02:58:13AM CEST: > > Files that are used as arguments of AC_CONFIG_FILES must have a maximum line > length (not counting the newline) of at most 3070. This limitation is not > documented in the autoconf manual. Could you please document it

autoconf: undocumented limitation

2009-04-05 Thread Bruno Haible
Hi, Files that are used as arguments of AC_CONFIG_FILES must have a maximum line length (not counting the newline) of at most 3070. This limitation is not documented in the autoconf manual. Could you please document it? Past this limit, config.status fails on HP-UX 11.00 and IRIX 6.5. On HP-UX