-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to Stepan Kasal on 6/18/2008 10:17 AM:
[wow - a month in my inbox]
|
| I tried to write something, and I ended up with a different version.
| I have also removed a trivial example; IMHO, it does not belong to
| this node and I guess the in
* Stepan Kasal wrote on Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 05:12:56AM CEST:
> On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 09:13:00PM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > > Pay attention that @samp{#undef} is in the first column, and there is
> > > +nothing after @samp{HAVE_UNISTD_H}, not even white space.
> >
> > FWIW, the current c
Hello Ralf,
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 09:13:00PM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > Pay attention that @samp{#undef} is in the first column, and there is
> > +nothing after @samp{HAVE_UNISTD_H}, not even white space.
>
> FWIW, the current code works fine with white space before '#' and
> between it
Hi Stepan,
* Stepan Kasal wrote on Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 06:17:01PM CEST:
> --- a/doc/autoconf.texi
> +++ b/doc/autoconf.texi
> @@ -3095,28 +3094,40 @@ commented out (in case the system predefines that
> symbol).
> @end example
>
> Pay attention that @samp{#undef} is in the first column, and
Hello Eric,
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 09:20:52PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
> | ``
> | Generally speaking, all #define and #undef directives in the header
> | template may be modified by config.status, under some circumstances.
> | Consequently, if you need to define or undefine a symbol under some
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to Stepan Kasal on 6/5/2008 10:28 AM:
| Hello,
Hi Stepan, Ralf,
|
| I'd like to propose a solution, please speak up if you are not
| satisfied with it. (If we reach an agreement, I'm willing to prepare
| a patch later.)
Well, now that Ra
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to Ralf Wildenhues on 6/16/2008 11:46 AM:
| Hello, and sorry for the delay,
Hello Ralf, and better late than never ;)
|
| I'm punting. The '#define header templates' test already requires that
| #undef macro additional-stuff
|
| removes
Hello, and sorry for the delay,
* Eric Blake wrote on Thu, Jun 05, 2008 at 11:37:01PM CEST:
> Stepan Kasal redhat.com> writes:
>
> > First, let me state that, strictly speaking, this is not a
> > regression. The Autoconf manual says that the #undef line cannot
> > contain anything after the sym
Stepan Kasal redhat.com> writes:
> First, let me state that, strictly speaking, this is not a
> regression. The Autoconf manual says that the #undef line cannot
> contain anything after the symbol. And in that case, all versions
> tested by Ralf do the same.
I agree that whether or not we cha
Hello,
I'd like to propose a solution, please speak up if you are not
satisfied with it. (If we reach an agreement, I'm willing to prepare
a patch later.)
First, let me state that, strictly speaking, this is not a
regression. The Autoconf manual says that the #undef line cannot
contain anything
Hi Eric,
thanks for the quick review.
* Eric Blake wrote on Wed, Jun 04, 2008 at 10:19:40PM CEST:
> Ralf Wildenhues gmx.de> writes:
> > # Replace #undef with comments. This is necessary, for example,
> > # in the case of _POSIX_SOURCE, which is predefined and required
> > # on some
Ralf Wildenhues gmx.de> writes:
>
> Hello Karsten,
>
> Thanks for the bug report.
Yes, thanks for bringing it to our attention.
>
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449245
It looks like the redhat bug was closed as not-a-bug, but I agree with Ralf's
analysis that a simple pat
Hello Karsten,
Thanks for the bug report.
* Karsten Hopp wrote on Wed, Jun 04, 2008 at 05:00:49PM CEST:
> (second attempt, first one got stuck in the maintainer queue)
Usually there is some latency due to the human involved in the
first-time moderation, and/or the system involved in spam filteri
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449245 lists two issues after
updating
autoconf in Fedora to 2.62.
- same line comments are now really broken where they worked before even though
this was discouraged.
The documentation should probably reflect this new behaviour if this breakage
(second attempt, first one got stuck in the maintainer queue)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449245 lists two issues after
updating
autoconf in Fedora to 2.62.
- same line comments are now really broken where they worked before even though
this was discouraged.
The documentation
15 matches
Mail list logo
