Re: small note about 'rm' portability

2006-10-24 Thread Paul Eggert
Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I think this qualifies as a portability pitfall. How about documenting it? Thanks. I installed the following slightly-more-general change. 2006-10-24 Paul Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * doc/autoconf.texi (Limitations of Usual Tools): Document t

small note about 'rm' portability

2006-10-24 Thread Bruno Haible
Seen on NetBSD 2.0.2: $ rm -rf usage: rm [-f|-i] [-dPRrvW] file ... $ type rm rm is hashed (/bin/rm) I think this qualifies as a portability pitfall. How about documenting it? 2006-10-24 Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * doc/autoconf.texi (Limitations of Usual Tools): One more note