Re: tweak for documentation of how to create universal binaries

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 According to Ralf Wildenhues on 4/18/2009 10:44 AM: > I'm still not quite ready to give up. Glad to hear it. > Can you try it out, and report back the depmode chosen with and without > --enable-dependency-tracking and whether the depmode works (in ca

Re: tweak for documentation of how to create universal binaries

[ adding automake-patches; this is ] Hello Bruno, Peter, * Bruno Haible wrote on Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 12:29:10PM CEST: > Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > AIUI, the nature of the issue seems to be that one process scribbles > > into the

Re: tweak for documentation of how to create universal binaries

Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > Well, if Bruno has run the latter command only (without going through > the depcomp wrapper), and got inconsistent results, then that indicates > a bug in this gcc. Peter, would you file a bug report with Apple for us? Well, if you put the multiple -arch flags in CFLAGS/

Re: tweak for documentation of how to create universal binaries

Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > Well, if Bruno has run the latter command only (without going through > the depcomp wrapper), and got inconsistent results, then that indicates > a bug in this gcc. Yes, the command that I ran 1000 times was the gcc command that produces the *.TPo file. > AIUI, the nature

Re: tweak for documentation of how to create universal binaries

* Eric Blake wrote on Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 02:49:51AM CEST: > According to Bruno Haible on 4/10/2009 5:21 PM: > > Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > >> How about trying to fix it instead of this? > > > > You want to know the "root of the problem"? Yes. The actual root of the problem. > > source='unictype

Re: tweak for documentation of how to create universal binaries

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 According to Bruno Haible on 4/10/2009 5:21 PM: > Ralf Wildenhues wrote: >> I would like to veto this patch, and in general the mentality of hacking >> around further away from the root of the problem than is necessary. >> >> How about trying to fix it

Re: tweak for documentation of how to create universal binaries

Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > I would like to veto this patch, and in general the mentality of hacking > around further away from the root of the problem than is necessary. > > How about trying to fix it instead of this? You want to know the "root of the problem"? Here it is: The automake generated Ma

Re: tweak for documentation of how to create universal binaries

* Bruno Haible wrote on Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 10:30:56PM CEST: > On 2008-08-17, we discussed what to write in INSTALL about the creation > of multi-arch binaries on MacOS X. In [1] Peter O'Gorman wrote: > > > For automake using projects --disable-dependency-tracking is also > > necessary. > > I di

tweak for documentation of how to create universal binaries

Hi, On 2008-08-17, we discussed what to write in INSTALL about the creation of multi-arch binaries on MacOS X. In [1] Peter O'Gorman wrote: > For automake using projects --disable-dependency-tracking is also > necessary. I didn't want to believe it, because I could not reproduce any problem with