Re: -local vs. -hook?

2008-06-04 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Karl Berry wrote on Tue, Jun 03, 2008 at 08:49:55PM CEST: > > +You may be tempted to use @code{install-data-local} to install a file > > +to some hard-coded location, but you should avoid this. > > +(@pxref{Hard-Coded Install Paths}) > > Shouldn't the period be moved from after "

Re: -local vs. -hook?

2008-06-04 Thread Ben Pfaff
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Karl Berry) writes: > +In contrast, some rules also have a way to run another rule, called a > [EMAIL PROTECTED]; these are always executed after their work is done. The The antecedents of "these" and "their" are slightly confusing here. I might reword it as: "...; hooks are

Re: sections without nodes in automake manual?

2008-06-04 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hi Karl, * Karl Berry wrote on Tue, Jun 03, 2008 at 07:26:20PM CEST: > I noticed automake.texi has many sectioning commands without nodes. > Mostly but not entirely @subsub-level entries. > > This is quite unusual. It leads to some very long nodes. Was it a > deliberate decision? I have no ide

Re: sections without nodes in automake manual?

2008-06-04 Thread Karl Berry
AIUI, the subsubheadings do not cause entries in the contents of the PDF file. I'm not sure I think that's better, though. Are there other differences I overlooked? Not in terms of formatting, but in terms of theory and how Texinfo is typically used -- @section and the like should al