Re: AM_PROG_GCJ fails at `make' if nothing else defines OBJEXT

2009-05-24 Thread Jack Kelly
On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 12:42 AM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > Hi Jack, > > * Jack Kelly wrote on Wed, May 13, 2009 at 01:24:40PM CEST: >> I've found that if nothing else defines OBJEXT, AM_PROG_GCJ won't do >> it and then make will fail with an error like: >> >>   make: *** No rule to make target `Te

Re: AM_PROG_GCJ fails at `make' if nothing else defines OBJEXT

2009-05-24 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hi Jack, * Jack Kelly wrote on Wed, May 13, 2009 at 01:24:40PM CEST: > I've found that if nothing else defines OBJEXT, AM_PROG_GCJ won't do > it and then make will fail with an error like: > > make: *** No rule to make target `Test.', needed by `test'. Stop. Thank you for the bug report and e

Re: automake-1.11 test failure on darwin9 - instmany-python.test

2009-05-24 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Peter O'Gorman wrote on Thu, May 21, 2009 at 03:39:29PM CEST: > Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > That aims to ensure that if you do > > ./configure --prefix=$HOME/local > > > > as non-root user, you have a chance to actually install your python > > files below $HOME, too, even with the buggy python

Re: automake 1.11: Lots of failed tests on Solaris 10 x86 w/Sun Studio compiler

2009-05-24 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hello Dagobert, * Dagobert Michelsen wrote on Tue, May 19, 2009 at 01:44:04PM CEST: > Am 18.05.2009 um 23:10 schrieb Ralf Wildenhues: >>> FAIL: insthook.test >> >> The insthook.test failure looks like you have some variables like >> $bindir or $exec_prefix or $prefix set in your environment. Is t