Re: Useless -r argument in install-sh

Hello Julien, thanks for the report. I'm adding the bug-automake list, as Automake is the upstream source of the install-sh script. For better understanding of list readers, this discussion is about this version of the install-sh script:

support for lzip (was: GNU Automake 1.11 released)

[ adding the automake list; as this is a topic of general interest ] Hello Antonio, and sorry for the delay, * Antonio Diaz Diaz wrote on Tue, May 19, 2009 at 06:26:53PM CEST: > Congratulations on the new release. Thank you! > Ralf Wildenhues wrote: >> >> - "make dist" can now create xz-compr

Automake Tests Failed

*SUMMARY MESSAGE* = 5 of 664 tests failed (65 tests were not run) See tests/test-suite.log Please report to bug-automake@gnu.org = make[3]: *** [test-suite.log] Error 1 make[2]: *** [check-TESTS] Error 2 make[1]: *** [c

Re: Automake Tests Failed

Hello Purvis, * Purvis Bedenbaugh wrote on Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 02:32:30PM CEST: > = > 5 of 664 tests failed > (65 tests were not run) > See tests/test-suite.log > Please report to bug-automake@gnu.org > = > *SYSTEM INFO*

Re: support for lzip

Ralf Wildenhues wrote: * Antonio Diaz Diaz wrote on Tue, May 19, 2009 at 06:26:53PM CEST: Do you plan to support the creation of lzip-compressed tarballs? http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/automake/2008-11/msg00076.html Well, to be honest, I regard the addition of lzma support as a mistake in

Re: Automake Tests Failed

Hello Purvis, please don't top-post, and please keep the list in Cc:, thanks! * Purvis Bedenbaugh wrote on Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 05:09:25PM CEST: > > This is the log file for the automake build. Thanks. All test failures look more or less like this: > if test "emacs" != no; then \ > set x; \

Re: support for lzip (was: GNU Automake 1.11 released)

On Fri, 12 Jun 2009, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: Well, to be honest, I regard the addition of lzma support as a mistake in hindsight. We should have waited and added xz support only, with a stable xz release. It was also a mistake that I did not deprecate lzma support more prominently in the 1.11 r

Re: support for lzip

> Ralf Wildenhues wrote: >> * Antonio Diaz Diaz wrote on Tue, May 19, 2009 at 06:26:53PM CEST: >>>Do you plan to support the creation of lzip-compressed tarballs? >>>http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/automake/2008-11/msg00076.html >> >> Well, to be honest, I regard the addition of lzma support as a