bug#8234: check_JAVA built during make

2011-04-09 Thread Stefano Lattarini
On Wednesday 06 April 2011, Stefano Lattarini wrote: > On Saturday 12 March 2011, Petteri Räty wrote: > > http://sources.redhat.com/automake/automake.html > > > > "The special prefix ‘check_’ indicates that the objects in question > > should not be built until the ‘make check’ command is run. Thos

bug#8461: Defining `java_JAVA' doesn't cause errors even if $(javadir) is indefined

2011-04-09 Thread Stefano Lattarini
Well, the subject says it all. The following example exposes the bug: $ cat > configure.ac <<'END' AC_INIT([x], [0]) AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE([foreign]) AC_CONFIG_FILES([Makefile]) END $ cat > Makefile.am <<'END' java_JAVA = foo.java END $ aclocal $ automake -a configure.ac:2: insta

bug#8360: distcheck-hook never called

2011-04-09 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hello Pitamila, let's keep the mailing list in Cc:, please. I would've seen your reply earlier then. * pitam...@free.fr wrote on Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 04:02:53PM CEST: > - "Ralf Wildenhues" a écrit : > > > > thanks for the report. > > thanks for the support, I hope my answer is not too late

bug#8360: distcheck-hook never called

2011-04-09 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Sat, Apr 09, 2011 at 01:11:58PM CEST: > OK to add you to THANKS for the eventual documentation patch I've yet to > write? Can we have a full name for that too?

bug#8434: java: cannot use JAVA with both dist_ and nodist_ prefixes

2011-04-09 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hi Stefano, * Stefano Lattarini wrote on Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 09:00:32PM CEST: > Currently, limitations in the Automake support for java enforce the > restriction that only one `_JAVA' primary can be used in a given > Makefile.am. > This bug is particularly annoying because *.java files listed wi