bug#7849: new instspc* test failures

2012-01-05 Thread Stefano Lattarini
Hi Peter, thanks for the patch. Looks good, modulo a couple of nits below. Feel free to push to master when they have been addressed. On 01/05/2012 01:35 AM, Peter Rosin wrote: From 27100f0b94f8e38e8bd30c27277d7ad4e9f4dd1a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Peter Rosin p...@lysator.liu.se Date:

bug#7849: new instspc* test failures

2012-01-05 Thread Peter Rosin
Stefano Lattarini skrev 2012-01-05 09:38: Hi Peter, thanks for the patch. Looks good, modulo a couple of nits below. Feel free to push to master when they have been addressed. Pushed with nits addressed. I'm not sure about the strange/strangely thing either, but strangely seems safer so...

bug#7849: new instspc* test failures

2012-01-05 Thread Stefano Lattarini
tags 7849 patch close 7849 thanks On 01/05/2012 10:53 AM, Peter Rosin wrote: Stefano Lattarini skrev 2012-01-05 09:38: Hi Peter, thanks for the patch. Looks good, modulo a couple of nits below. Feel free to push to master when they have been addressed. Pushed with nits addressed. I'm not

bug#10436: New testsuite driver and extra trailing backslash in recipes

2012-01-05 Thread Stefano Lattarini
On 01/05/2012 01:47 PM, Stefano Lattarini wrote: [adding bug-automake in CC:] Reference: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=104367#8 And here is the definitive version of the patch that I'll push by this evening (to master) if there is no objection. Thanks, Stefano From

bug#10437: parallel-tests: `recheck' recipe can cause sed to be invoked with too long input lines

2012-01-05 Thread Paul Eggert
On 01/05/12 06:07, Stefano Lattarini wrote: Which sort of thing exactly? I could find only one place which suffers of the problem you've pointed out, i.e., the `recheck recheck-html' rules in lib/am/check.am. Am I missing something? Sorry, that appears to have been a miscount on my part: I

bug#10436: bug#10427: bug#10436: New testsuite driver and extra trailing backslash in recipes

2012-01-05 Thread Paul Eggert
I pushed the following doc fix into Autoconf, so that these two portability issues are documented there. It turns out that the second issue is actually due to an old Bash bug -- it's not Solaris-specific. From b1f0e147aa7aa259dea2c34c5a0ac7965d6efd7e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Paul Eggert

bug#10440: Can't locate TAP/Parser.pm

2012-01-05 Thread Peter Rosin
Hi! I tried make check on MSYS with the current master, and among other things, this problem stands out as it FAILs so many test cases. I'm using tap-bailout-w.test as an example, no use reporting the same problem 80+ times, right :-) The perl version is 5.8.8 Here's tap-bailout-w.log:

bug#10441: The testsuite assumes that ln -s really creates a symlink

2012-01-05 Thread Peter Rosin
Hi! ln -s on MSYS does not create a symlink, instead it makes a regular copy. Lots of test cases (on master) FAIL due to this. test -h foo will simply not return success on MSYS, ever. Affected tests (that I have noticed): add-missing.tap (lots of failing test cases) copy.test Cheers, Peter