bug#11345: Fwd: lex-depend-cxx automake-1.12 test failure on Mac OS X 10.7.3 (Xcode-4.3.2)

2012-04-26 Thread Stefano Lattarini
Forwarding this to bug-automake, so that we'll have a bug number to reference in our fix. Original message: Original Message Subject: lex-depend-cxx automake-1.12 test failure on Mac OS X 10.7.3 (Xcode-4.3.2)

bug#11346: automake-1.12 - one test fails (due to truncated timestamp)

2012-04-26 Thread Peter Breitenlohner
Hi, I just fetched automake-1.12, built it on our no-distro x86-linux-gnu system uname -r: 2.6.28.6-x86_64 (most binaries are 32-bit) /lib/libc-2.3.6.so /lib64/libc-2.3.6.so and got one test suite failure. FAIL: t/self-check-is_newest.tap 19 - is_newest u x It seems that 'touch -r x u

bug#11345: Fwd: lex-depend-cxx automake-1.12 test failure on Mac OS X 10.7.3 (Xcode-4.3.2)

2012-04-26 Thread Stefano Lattarini
Hi Adam, thanks for the report. On 04/26/2012 10:05 AM, Adam Mercer wrote: > > I've been looking at getting the version of automake in MacPorts > updated to automake-1.12 and I'm getting the following test failure: > > FAIL: t/lex-depend-cxx > == > > [SNIP] > > + make > /bin/

bug#11346: automake-1.12 - one test fails (due to truncated timestamp)

2012-04-26 Thread Stefano Lattarini
On 04/26/2012 10:26 AM, Peter Breitenlohner wrote: > Hi, > Hi Peter, thanks for the report (and the fix ;-) > I just fetched automake-1.12, built it on our no-distro x86-linux-gnu > system > > uname -r: 2.6.28.6-x86_64 (most binaries are 32-bit) > /lib/libc-2.3.6.so > /lib64/libc-2.3.6.so >

bug#11346: automake-1.12 - one test fails (due to truncated timestamp)

2012-04-26 Thread Peter Breitenlohner
On Thu, 26 Apr 2012, Stefano Lattarini wrote: Good idea. Can you confirm that the attached patch solves your problem? Hi Stefano, it does indeed. BTW: The "Copyright-paperwork-exempt: yes" should be unnecessary because you should still have the paperwork from the ObjC++ integration. Regard

bug#11346: automake-1.12 - one test fails (due to truncated timestamp)

2012-04-26 Thread Stefano Lattarini
tags 11346 + patch thanks On 04/26/2012 11:32 AM, Peter Breitenlohner wrote: > On Thu, 26 Apr 2012, Stefano Lattarini wrote: > >> Good idea. Can you confirm that the attached patch solves your problem? > > Hi Stefano, > > it does indeed. > Good. Will push shortly then. > BTW: The "Copyright-

bug#11345: Fwd: lex-depend-cxx automake-1.12 test failure on Mac OS X 10.7.3 (Xcode-4.3.2)

2012-04-26 Thread Stefano Lattarini
On 04/26/2012 10:38 AM, Stefano Lattarini wrote: > Hi Adam, thanks for the report. > > On 04/26/2012 10:05 AM, Adam Mercer wrote: >> >> I've been looking at getting the version of automake in MacPorts >> updated to automake-1.12 and I'm getting the following test failure: >> >> FAIL: t/lex-depend-

bug#11347: the remake rules in the automake test suite are too greedy

2012-04-26 Thread Stefano Lattarini
Severity: minor Reference: On 04/22/2012 08:10 PM, Bruno Haible wrote: > > [SNIP] > > Modifying a test apparently requires me to have the same exact Autoconf > version (2.68) as you did. What an annoyance! I have to proceed like this: > > 1.

bug#11346: automake-1.12 - one test fails (due to truncated timestamp)

2012-04-26 Thread Stefano Lattarini
On 04/26/2012 11:38 AM, Stefano Lattarini wrote: > Will push shortly then. > Pushed now. I'm thus closing this bug report. Thanks, Stefano

bug#11346: automake-1.12 - one test fails (due to truncated timestamp)

2012-04-26 Thread Peter Breitenlohner
On Thu, 26 Apr 2012, Stefano Lattarini wrote: because you should still have the paperwork from the ObjC++ integration. I wasn't involved in the project yet back then, so I wasn't aware you had the paperwork in place already. Now I am :-) Hi Stefano, and the whole ObjC++ integration (one of

bug#11347: the remake rules in the automake test suite are too greedy

2012-04-26 Thread Stefano Lattarini
On 04/26/2012 12:10 PM, Stefano Lattarini wrote: > Severity: minor > > Reference: > > On 04/22/2012 08:10 PM, Bruno Haible wrote: >> >> [SNIP] >> >> Modifying a test apparently requires me to have the same exact Autoconf >> version (2.68) as

bug#11347: the remake rules in the automake test suite are too greedy

2012-04-26 Thread Eric Blake
On 04/26/2012 07:10 AM, Stefano Lattarini wrote: >> > > And here is a patch. The change itself is obvious, but I'd like a review > on the long-winded commit message. I will push by tomorrow if there is no > review by then. > > > The described situation could hinder hinder on-field testing or

bug#11345: Fwd: lex-depend-cxx automake-1.12 test failure on Mac OS X 10.7.3 (Xcode-4.3.2)

2012-04-26 Thread Stefano Lattarini
tags 11345 patch severity 11345 minor close 11345 thanks On 04/26/2012 03:56 PM, Adam Mercer wrote: > On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 04:42, Stefano Lattarini > wrote: > >>> Does the attached patch solves the problem for you? >>> >> Oops, I forgot to add you to the THANKS file. Consider the following >

bug#11347: the remake rules in the automake test suite are too greedy

2012-04-26 Thread Stefano Lattarini
tags 11347 + patch close 11347 thanks On 04/26/2012 04:28 PM, Eric Blake wrote: > On 04/26/2012 07:10 AM, Stefano Lattarini wrote: >> And here is a patch. The change itself is obvious, but I'd like a review >> on the long-winded commit message. >> > [SNIP] useful review > I've addressed all you n

bug#11345: Fwd: lex-depend-cxx automake-1.12 test failure on Mac OS X 10.7.3 (Xcode-4.3.2)

2012-04-26 Thread Adam Mercer
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 04:42, Stefano Lattarini wrote: >> Does the attached patch solves the problem for you? >> > Oops, I forgot to add you to the THANKS file.  Consider the following > hunk squashed in: Yes, that does the trick. Cheers Adam

bug#11356: automake 1.12 and (C) 2011

2012-04-26 Thread Peter Johansson
Hello, Just a tiny nit. After installing the new version (1.12) of automake I noticed that 'automake --version' outputs: automake (GNU automake) 1.12 Copyright (C) 2011 Free Software Foundation, Inc. whereas I expected it to say 'Copyright (C) 2012...' Cheers, Peter