bug#10374: 3 test failures on fedora 16

reproduce a similar failure on the Fedora 16 system (on pcc64 machine) at the GCC compile farm, and fix it with the attached patch. Does that patch works for you as well? > + exit_status=127 > + set +e > + cd /h/j/w/co/automake/tests > + test no = yes > + case $am_explicit_skip

bug#10374: depmod.tap failures on master (was: Re: bug#10374: 3 test failures on fedora 16)

On 12/26/2011 11:26 PM, Jim Meyering wrote: > FAIL: depmod > FAIL: depmod.tap 50 - tru64 [long VPATH] make & remake > FAIL: depmod.tap 84 - tru64 [absolute VPATH] make & remake > Known long-standing failures; see:

bug#10374: 3 test failures on fedora 16

Hi Jim. On 12/26/2011 11:07 PM, Jim Meyering wrote: > Hello, > I was surprised to see test failures on Fedora 16. > > At least the color2 failure seems to be due to a difference > in how expect works. > > + expect -f expect-make > + cat stdout > + spawn make -e check > > Here, its "

bug#10237: AM_SILENT_RULES does not work with NonStop make

On 12/26/2011 07:09 PM, Paul Eggert wrote: > On 12/26/11 09:42, Stefano Lattarini wrote: >> And here is the follow-up tweaking for the test cases I had >> promised. I will push in a couple of days if there is no objection. > > Thanks, that looks good to me; please push i

bug#10371: Broken links in the on-line automake manual

Feeding the address of the on-line automake manual: to the W3C linkchecker: I've found the following *broken links*:

bug#8071: Please rename automake invocation node

ting third-party links to our HTML documentation (OK, that could probably be fixed with an update to the .symlinks file in the CVS repository of the Automake web pages, but IMHO it's not worth the hassle). Thanks, Stefano >From b1b43854dfcb2419bfd5c725aebc42b866374b75 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2

bug#10237: bug#9928: bug#10237: AM_SILENT_RULES does not work with NonStop make

tags 10237 + patch tags 9928 + patch thanks On 12/25/2011 07:04 PM, Paul Eggert wrote: > On 12/23/11 00:50, Stefano Lattarini wrote: >> could you apply the patch *not to maint nor to master*, but to a *new* >> branch (say `silent-fixes' or `silent-portability') based

bug#9807: [PATCH] {maint} tests: better handling of gettext and libtool requirements

On 12/22/2011 06:47 PM, Stefano Lattarini wrote: > On 12/14/2011 02:06 PM, Stefano Lattarini wrote: >> This change fixes automake bug#9807. >> > I've squashed in the fixlet below, tested the patch on NetBSD 5.1 for good > measure (the libtool tests that were by default b

bug#8076: PCH support

On 12/23/2011 09:51 PM, Warren Young wrote: > On 12/23/2011 9:46 AM, Stefano Lattarini wrote: >> >> I know basically nothing about PCH, > > The only important thing to know is that it's a way to make the compiler dump > its parse tree to disk during compilation so t

bug#10237: bug#9928: bug#10237: AM_SILENT_RULES does not work with NonStop make

[adding automake-patches -- which I should have done before] On 12/22/2011 10:56 PM, Paul Eggert wrote: > On 12/21/11 04:21, Stefano Lattarini wrote: >> Hi Paul, thanks for the respin. My comments and objections are inlined. > > Thanks, I have a patch updated with all those c

bug#9768: Makefile broken after removing included *.am file

References: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/automake-patches/2011-11/msg00056.html> <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=9768> On 11/22/2011 10:19 PM, Stefano Lattarini wrote: > > For the moment, I've pushed two changes that enhance the testsuite > cover

bug#9807: [PATCH] {maint} tests: better handling of gettext and libtool requirements

On 12/14/2011 02:06 PM, Stefano Lattarini wrote: > This change fixes automake bug#9807. > I've squashed in the fixlet below, tested the patch on NetBSD 5.1 for good measure (the libtool tests that were by default being skipped there started to run and pass, yay!), and pushed to maint

bug#10226: Drop redundant Python 1.5 support?

On 12/08/2011 11:32 PM, Stefano Lattarini wrote: > tags 10226 + patch > thanks > > On Thursday 08 December 2011, Reuben Thomas wrote: >> On 7 December 2011 23:31, Stefano Lattarini >> wrote: >>> severity 10226 minor >>>> >>> I'd be int

bug#10026: Toward release of automake 1.11.2

On 12/21/2011 07:53 PM, Stefano Lattarini wrote: > References: > <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=10026> > <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=10324> > <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/automake/2011-12/msg00039.html> > > OK a

bug#10026: Toward release of automake 1.11.2

References: OK automakers, here we are: I'm going to release the 1.11.2 tarball this evening or tomorrow if there are n

bug#10301: Problems in $(LIBTOOL) deifnition

tags 10301 notabug close 10301 thanks Hi Marko. Sorry for the delay, but this thread had fallen outside my radar. On 12/15/2011 11:54 AM, Marko Lindqvist wrote: > On 15 December 2011 11:54, Stefano Lattarini > wrote: >>> >>> I'm cross-compiling gettext to mingw32-t

bug#9928: bug#10237: AM_SILENT_RULES does not work with NonStop make

Hi Paul, thanks for the respin. My comments and objections are inlined. On 12/21/2011 02:30 AM, Paul Eggert wrote: > On 12/11/11 01:42, Stefano Lattarini wrote: > >> I was asking for a test case that simulates the presence of a >> make implementation unable to grasp nested v

bug#10324: [Platform-testers] Automake 1.11.1b test release

On 12/20/2011 09:31 PM, Peter Rosin wrote: > Stefano Lattarini skrev 2011-12-19 18:18: >> Hi Peter. >> >> On 12/19/2011 06:51 AM, Peter Rosin wrote: >>> Bruno Haible skrev 2011-12-19 03:11: >>> >>> *snip* >>> >>>> * Cygwin 1.7.

bug#10324: [Platform-testers] Automake 1.11.1b test release

Hi Peter, thanks for the patch. On 12/20/2011 09:15 PM, Peter Rosin wrote: > > How about this for maint? Caution, I'm pretty much ignorant of lex details... > Surely no more than I am, so I'll follow your lead. I just have a couple of nits below. > Cheers, > Peter > > 2011-12-20 Peter Rosin

bug#10324: [Platform-testers] Automake 1.11.1b test release

On 12/19/2011 03:11 AM, Bruno Haible wrote: > === > > * msvc9 > > FAIL: specflg10.test > > Problem with the dependency support. > > Find attached the log file. > > I used the configuration commands > > CC="$HOME/msvc/

bug#10324: [Platform-testers] Automake 1.11.1b test release

On 12/20/2011 10:40 AM, Peter Rosin wrote: I'm waiting for confirmation that it works, and I'm not going to have much time the following days, so you might be better off handling it yourself, if you have some agenda due to the pending release. No problem, I will commit the fix once I have conf

bug#10324: [Platform-testers] Automake 1.11.1b test release

On 12/19/2011 10:58 AM, Peter Rosin wrote: [Bruno: Sorry, I failed to keep your address in the replies, see also http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-automake/2011-12/msg00052.html which has a workaround for some of your Cygwin troubles. Maybe you got a copy from the bug tracker, I don't know...

bug#10324: [Platform-testers] Automake 1.11.1b test release

Hi Bruno, thanks for the testing and the report. Note that I will snip from my reply those parts of your message Peter has already answered to. On 12/19/2011 03:11 AM, Bruno Haible wrote: The pre-release automake version 1.11.1b is now available at . Some buil

bug#10324: [Platform-testers] Automake 1.11.1b test release

Hi Peter. On 12/19/2011 06:51 AM, Peter Rosin wrote: Bruno Haible skrev 2011-12-19 03:11: *snip* * Cygwin 1.7.9 19 of 808 tests failed FAIL: distcheck-override-infodir.test FAIL: fort4.test FAIL: gettext.test FAIL: instdir-texi.test FAIL: parallel-am.test FAIL: txinfo3.test FAIL: txinfo13.t

bug#10026: [Platform-testers] Automake 1.11.1b test release

On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 3:02 PM, Stefano Lattarini < stefano.lattar...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Eric. > > On Friday 16 December 2011, Eric Blake wrote: > > On 12/16/2011 03:26 AM, Stefano Lattarini wrote: > > > +++ b/tests/defs.in > > > @@ -103,6 +103,17 @

bug#10026: [Platform-testers] Automake 1.11.1b test release

Hi Eric. On Friday 16 December 2011, Eric Blake wrote: > On 12/16/2011 03:26 AM, Stefano Lattarini wrote: > > +++ b/tests/defs.in > > @@ -103,6 +103,17 @@ test -z "$AUTORECONF" && AUTORECONF="@am_AUTORECONF@" > > test -z "$AUTOHEADER"

bug#10301: Problems in $(LIBTOOL) deifnition (was: Re: automake bug#10301: /bin/sh used to execute libtool)

[CC:ing bug-libtool] Hi Marko, thanks for the report. On Wednesday 14 December 2011, Marko Lindqvist wrote: > I'm not entirely sure if this is automake or libtool bug, but assuming > automake so reporting here. > > I'm cross-compiling gettext to mingw32-target in linux system. I have > to regener

bug#10278: color-p.test failed

tags 10278 notabug close 10278 thanks On Wednesday 14 December 2011, Savio Wong wrote: > Hi Stefano, > > Well, I am a 40+ non-IT old man, please bear with me for my strange > acts. > I see no stange act here, on the contrary, I appreciate your report and your prompt answer! In fact, I believe t

bug#9807: [PATCH] {maint} tests: better handling of gettext and libtool requirements

toolize' script) for libtool macro files required + by most libtool tests, and making them easily accessible. + * tests/defs.in: Update to make it rely on the results and setups + of `libtool-macros.test' and `gettext-macros.test'. + * tests/Makefile.am: Declare d

bug#10278: color-p.test failed

tags 10278 moreinfo thanks Thanks for the report. Unfortunately, I've not been able to understand the reason of this failure. We might need more details for that; so, could you please: 1. tell us which system you have run the testsuite on; 2. send us the config.log file generated by configur

bug#10237: AM_SILENT_RULES does not work with NonStop make

Hi Paul. On Saturday 10 December 2011, Paul Eggert wrote: > On 12/06/11 11:02, Stefano Lattarini wrote: > > If you are interested in accomodating this fringe situation, I will > > then accept a patch on the lines Paul has proposed (with a mandatory > > testcase, otherwise it

bug#10248: Broken link to sources.redhat.com in the web page of the automake mailing list

On Saturday 10 December 2011, Glenn Morris wrote: > > Hi, > Hi Glenn, thanks for the tip. Much appreciated. > You change this by going to the "administrative interface" in mailman > > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/admin/automake > > Then in the "General Options" page, edit the "introductory de

bug#10226: Drop redundant Python 1.5 support?

tags 10226 + patch thanks On Thursday 08 December 2011, Reuben Thomas wrote: > On 7 December 2011 23:31, Stefano Lattarini > wrote: > > severity 10226 minor > >> > > I'd be interested in such a patch; unfortunately, the one you've sent > > is completel

bug#10248: Broken link to sources.redhat.com in the web page of the automake mailing list

Here: I still see a reference to the obsolete and now removed But I don't know how to fix this, since the web page reported above seems not to be part of the CVS repository of Automake web pages `:ext:cvs.sava

bug#10237: AM_SILENT_RULES does not work with NonStop make

reopen 10237 tags 10237 - wontfix thanks On Tuesday 06 December 2011, Eric Blake wrote: > > >> I'm extremely reluctant to add yet more complexity to automake > > > > I don't see this change as adding much complexity. It should be > > pretty simple, and it shouldn't affect Automake much. So I gu

bug#10237: AM_SILENT_RULES does not work with NonStop make

tags 10237 wontfix close 10237 thanks Hi Paul, thanks for the report. On Tuesday 06 December 2011, Paul Eggert wrote: > If AM_SILENT_RULES is used, Automake generates Makefile.in > files with lines like this: > > AM_V_CC = $(am__v_CC_$(V)) > am__v_CC_ = $(am__v_CC_$(AM_DEFAULT_VERBOSITY)) >

bug#10157: broken links at http://www.gnu.org/software/automake/

Hi Adam. On Tuesday 06 December 2011, Adam Spiers wrote: > On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 7:28 PM, Stefano Lattarini > > Ping? I will push this by tomorrow if there is no review by then, since > > having a suboptimal and/or confusing wording on the main webpage is > > still bette

bug#10157: broken links at http://www.gnu.org/software/automake/

On Sunday 04 December 2011, Stefano Lattarini wrote: > Hi Adam, thanks for the report. > > On Monday 28 November 2011, Adam Spiers wrote: > > http://www.gnu.org/software/automake/ has several broken links, all > > pointing to sources.redhat.com. > > > > It seems

bug#10026: branch-11.1 testsuite on Fedora ppc-64 [1] [few spurious failures; FIXED now]

- silent-many-generic.test The attached patch, beckported from similar ones from master and testsuite-work, fixed this issue. From ca0ba5df0fb8d3a62919b878ee30fa573dde6f93 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 Message-Id: From: Stefano Lattarini Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2011 23:18:34 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] tests: fix sp

bug#10210: [PATCH] lib/depcomp: spelling fix in usage message

Hi Paul. On Sunday 04 December 2011, Paul Eggert wrote: > Found while spell-checking Emacs. Here's a proposed patch. > Thanks. I've applied the patch in your name (see attachement), and I'm thus closing this bug report. Just a minor nit though: next time, could you send your patches to the auto

bug#10157: broken links at http://www.gnu.org/software/automake/

Hi Adam, thanks for the report. On Monday 28 November 2011, Adam Spiers wrote: > http://www.gnu.org/software/automake/ has several broken links, all > pointing to sources.redhat.com. > > It seems that related issues were flagged before: > > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/automake/2011-07/msg0

bug#10154: ylwrap error:

On Monday 28 November 2011, Joe Chen wrote: > On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 12:32 PM, Stefano Lattarini > > > > On Monday 28 November 2011, Joe Chen wrote: > >> > >> I am using automake for compile flex input file. The flex command > >> line option --prefix= or

bug#10154: ylwrap error:

tags 10154 notabug thanks On Monday 28 November 2011, Joe Chen wrote: > Hi, > Hi Joe, thanks for the report. > I am using automake for compile flex input file. The flex command > line option --prefix= or -P works with the direct > invoking of flex, buy ylwrap gets error all the time for me: > >

bug#10151: tests failed

tags 10151 moreinfo thanks On Monday 28 November 2011, mohamed wrote: > i got this message please tell me should i reconfigure or go ahead and > continue the installation > > FAIL: instsh.test > FAIL: location.test > XFAIL: txinfo5.test > FAIL: warnopts.test > > > =

bug#10111: typo fix

1 Message-Id: <39a0fd0267ca5aab3d7c4677586181c355233eef.1322133328.git.stefano.lattar...@gmail.com> From: Stefano Lattarini Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2011 12:14:49 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] cosmetics: typofix in comments MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encod

bug#9768: Makefile broken after removing included *.am file

On Sunday 23 October 2011, Stefano Lattarini wrote: > Hi Ralf. > > On Thursday 20 October 2011, Stefano Lattarini wrote: > > On Wednesday 19 October 2011, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > > > > > Am I missing something? > > > > > I hope so :-) -- o

bug#10111: remake rules can fail in a weird corner case (VPATH into $distdir).

Severity: minor thanks This report describes a failure of the automake-generated remake rules in a particular, low-probability scenario. I admit upfront that the scenario I'm speaking about is pretty corner-case, and very unlikely to be problemtic in practice. Still, I think it's still worth hav

bug#10026: [PATCH] texinfo: work around Solaris 10 xpg4 shell bug in install rules (was: Re: bug#10026: branch-11.1 testsuite on Solaris 10 [3] (XPG4 sh, Sun Studio compilers, autoconf 2.62) [almost O

On Saturday 19 November 2011, Stefano Lattarini wrote: > On Saturday 12 November 2011, Stefano Lattarini wrote: > > SETUP: > > Solaris 10, "rich /usr/local" (e.g., contains `expr' from GNU coreutils > > 6.9 and gawk 3.1.5), VPATH build, perl 5.10.0, autocon

bug#10026: [PATCH] texinfo: work around Solaris 10 xpg4 shell bug in install rules (was: Re: bug#10026: branch-11.1 testsuite on Solaris 10 [3] (XPG4 sh, Sun Studio compilers, autoconf 2.62) [almost O

On Saturday 12 November 2011, Stefano Lattarini wrote: > SETUP: > Solaris 10, "rich /usr/local" (e.g., contains `expr' from GNU coreutils > 6.9 and gawk 3.1.5), VPATH build, perl 5.10.0, autoconf 2.62, testsuite > run with GNU make 3.82, test scri

bug#10026: branch-11.1 testsuite on Cygwin 1.5.25 on WinXP (no libtool, Fortran, nor Tex installed) [PASS]

On Thursday 17 November 2011, Stefano Lattarini wrote: > SETUP: > Cygwin 1.5.25 on Windows XP, in-tree build, perl 5.10.0, /bin/sh is > Bash 3.2.48, gcc and g++ version is 3.4.4, no installation of libtool, > Fortran compilers, nor TeX is present. > > RESULTS: > No fa

bug#10026: branch-11.1 testsuite on FreeBSD [1] [OK, 2 knonwn failures]

SETUP: FreeBSD 8.2, VPATH build, perl 5.10.1, autoconf 2.68, testsuite run with FreeBSD native make, test scripts run by /bin/sh, using the system-provided GNU compilers (4.2.1) and libtool 2.4.0. RESULTS: Two real failures, both due to a known FreeBSD make bug/incompatibility, and both

bug#10026: branch-11.1 testsuite on NetBSD 5.1 [2] (gmake, more /bin/sh) [PASS]

SETUP: NetBSD 5.1, in-tree build, perl 5.12.2, autoconf 2.68, $CONFIG_SHELL explicitly exported to /bin/sh, testsuite is run with GNU make 3.82, GCC and the GNU compilers (4.1.3) and libtool 2.2.6b. RESULTS: No failure :-) This file contains any messages produced by compilers while running

bug#10031: branch-11.1 testsuite on Debian [3] (bash 3.0, gmake 3.79, libtool 1.5) [PASS]

tags 10031 notabug close 10031 thanks On Saturday 12 November 2011, Stefano Lattarini wrote: > SETUP: > Debian unstable, VPATH build, perl 5.12.4, autoconf 2.63, testsuite > run with GNU make 3.79, test scripts run by bash 3.0, with CONFIG_SHELL > exported to bash 3.0, using GCC

bug#10026: branch-11.1 testsuite on Debian [3] (bash 3.0, gmake 3.79, libtool 1.5) [PASS]

SETUP: Debian unstable, VPATH build, perl 5.12.4, autoconf 2.63, testsuite run with GNU make 3.79, test scripts run by bash 3.0, with CONFIG_SHELL exported to bash 3.0, using GCC and the GNU compilers (4.5) and libtool 1.5.6. RESULTS: No Failures :-) This file contains any messages prod

bug#10026: branch-11.1 testsuite on Solaris 10 [3] (XPG4 sh, Sun Studio compilers, autoconf 2.62) [almost OK]

is sane... yes checking for a thread-safe mkdir -p... /opt/sfw/bin/mkdir -p checking for gawk... gawk checking whether make sets $(MAKE)... yes checking for style of include used by make... GNU checking for gcc... suncc checking for C compiler default output file name... a.out checking whether the C co

bug#10026: branch-11.1 testsuite on Solaris 10 [4] (Sun Distributed make, autoconf 2.62) [PASS]

SETUP: Solaris 10, "rich /usr/local" (e.g., contains `expr' from GNU coreutils 6.9 and gawk 3.1.5), VPATH build, perl 5.12.2, autoconf 2.62, testsuite run with Sun Distributed Make 7.8 (2007/07/19), test scripts run by /bin/sh, CONFIG_SHELL exported to /bin/sh, using gcc and GNU compilers

bug#10026: Toward release of automake 1.11.2: testsuite results

SETUP: Solaris 10, "rich /usr/local" (e.g., contains `expr' from GNU coreutils 6.9 and gawk 3.1.5), in-tree build, perl 5.12.2, autoconf 2.68, testsuite run with GNU make 3.82, test scripts run by /bin/sh, using gcc and GNU compilers (4.6.2) and libtool 2.4.2. RESULTS: No failure :-) Thi

bug#10027: branch-11.1 testsuite on Debian [2] (some older tools) [PASS]

tags 10027 notabug close 10027 thanks Oops, messed up while replying, opened a spurious bug report. Closing it right now. Sorry for the noise, Stefano

bug#10026: branch-11.1 testsuite on Debian [2] (some older tools) [PASS]

SETUP: Debian unstable, in-tree build, perl 5.6.2, autoconf 2.65, /bin/sh is Bash 4.1.5, testsuite is run with GNU make 3.80, GCC and the GNU compilers (3.4.6) and libtool 2.2.2. RESULTS: No failure :-) This file contains any messages produced by compilers while running configure, to aid

bug#10026: branch-11.1 testsuite on Debian [1] [PASS]

SETUP: Debian unstable, in-tree build, perl 5.12.4, autoconf 2.64, testsuite run with GNU make 3.81, test scripts run by bash 4.1.5, using GCC and the GNU compilers (4.6) and libtool 2.4.0. RESULTS: No failure :-) This file contains any messages produced by compilers while running configur

bug#10026: Toward release of automake 1.11.2: testsuite results

Hello automakers. I've started a round of testsuite runs in view of the release of automake 11.1.2. I'll post the test results I'm obtaining here on , for better reference and visibility. The report opened by this mail is meant to be closed after 1.11.2 is released. Here is a mostly complete li

bug#9807: custom libtool installation and automake testsuite failures

On Sunday 06 November 2011, Jim Meyering wrote: > I install my own versions of m4, autoconf, automake, libtool, etc., > using --prefix=/p, and I put /p/bin earlier in PATH than /usr/bin, etc. > > Because of that, I've always had to initialize > /p/share/aclocal/dirlist to contain /usr/share/acloca

bug#9807: custom libtool installation and automake testsuite failures (was: Re: [PATCH] tests: avoid false positive due to change in --help formatting)

Hi Jim. On Sunday 06 November 2011, Jim Meyering wrote: > Stefano Lattarini wrote: > > On Friday 04 November 2011, Stefano Lattarini wrote: > >> On Friday 04 November 2011, Stefano Lattarini wrote: > >> > > >> > [SNIP] > >> > > >> &g

bug#9890: cosmetic bug in AM_MAINTAINER_MODE

On Saturday 29 October 2011, Zack Weinberg wrote: > On 2011-10-29 3:18 AM, Stefano Lattarini wrote: > > Zack, are you the same "Zack Weinberg" already listed in the THANKS file > > with the address "z...@codesourcery.com"? If yes, should I update that >

bug#9928: AM_SILENT_RULES breakage with old make(1)

tags 9928 wontfix close 9928 thanks On Tuesday 01 November 2011, Daniel Richard wrote: > Hello list, > Hi Daniel, thanks for the report. > I've recently encountered some breakage in building a package > with Automake 1.11.1's new silent-rules feature enabled, on a > VM install of NeXTSTEP 3.3. An

bug#9822: AMTAR not used

Hi Akim, thanks for the report. On Friday 21 October 2011, Akim Demaille wrote: > Hi all, > > My apologies if this has already been discussed. > > I too have been hit by the fact that Tar on OS X tries to preserve > special features of files in "hidden" files (a thread about this > started here:

bug#9773: "make install-info" with DESTDIR writes unwanted usr/share/info/dir.gz

tags 9773 patch close 9773 thanks On Sunday 23 October 2011, Stefano Lattarini wrote: > Here is my proposed patch (for maint). I will push in 72 hours > if there is no objection or review by then. > I've pushed the patch to maint now (after addressing the nits pointed out by J

bug#9890: cosmetic bug in AM_MAINTAINER_MODE

ce9a5ff3fa4a7afbf5e85464f715ba523 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 Message-Id: <58c1537ce9a5ff3fa4a7afbf5e85464f715ba523.1319883380.git.stefano.lattar...@gmail.com> From: Stefano Lattarini Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2011 12:15:59 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] maint-mode: fix botched configure messages This cha

bug#8526: [PATCH] {maint} deps: partially revert commit `v1.11-512-geeee551'

tags 8485 patch tags 8526 patch close 8485 close 8526 thanks On Thursday 20 October 2011, Stefano Lattarini wrote: > This change partly reverts commit "Create subdirs for generated > sources even when not dep tracking", of 2011-04-02. > > That commit had caused the bugs #

bug#9859: subdir-objects, dirstamps and --disable-dependency-tracking

Hello automakers. The recent commit `v1.11-512-g40c3432', required to fix automake bugs #8485 and #8526, has re-introduced the bug reported by Ignacy Gawedzki in his message "subdir-objects, dirstamps and --disable-dependency-tracking (bug?)", posted to the automake list in March 2011. I'm thus r

bug#9768: Makefile broken after removing included *.am file

Hi Ralf. On Thursday 20 October 2011, Stefano Lattarini wrote: > On Wednesday 19 October 2011, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > > > Am I missing something? > > > I hope so :-) -- otherwise I've completely misunderstood something > cardinal here. > Ping on this? I&

bug#9773: "make install-info" with DESTDIR writes unwanted usr/share/info/dir.gz

On Sunday 23 October 2011, Jonathan Nieder wrote: > Stefano Lattarini wrote: > > > Here is my proposed patch (for maint). > > Thanks! Two nits: > Thanks for the quick review, consider those nits fixed. Also, I've seen that the test script I've added was crea

bug#9773: "make install-info" with DESTDIR writes unwanted usr/share/info/dir.gz

On Sunday 23 October 2011, Jonathan Nieder wrote: > Stefano Lattarini wrote: > > On Monday 17 October 2011, Jonathan Nieder wrote: > > >> +++ b/ChangeLog > >> @@ -1,3 +1,16 @@ > >> +2011-10-17 Jonathan Nieder > >> + > >> + For Debian

bug#9773: "make install-info" with DESTDIR writes unwanted usr/share/info/dir.gz

On Monday 17 October 2011, Jonathan Nieder wrote: > Hi, > Hi Jonathan, sorry for the delay. > [SNIP] > > In other words, how about this patch? Untested for now. > --- > [1] http://bugs.debian.org/543992 > [2] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?msg=25;bug=543992 > > ChangeLog

bug#7873: Automake should support adding to DejaGnu site.exp

On Wednesday 19 October 2011, Stefano Lattarini wrote: > Reference: > <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=7873> > > I've rebased the branch on the "fixup" commit `v1.11-250-g0c0b402', and > I will merge it to maint (and push) in a couple of days

bug#7833: automake uses two different values for DejaGNU srcdir

On Wednesday 19 October 2011, Stefano Lattarini wrote: > Reference: > <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=7873> > > I've rebased my patch on the "fixup" commit `v1.11-250-g0c0b402', and > I will merge it to maint (and push) in a couple of days

bug#8485: [PATCH] {maint} deps: partially revert commit `v1.11-512-geeee551'

- 4 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) diff --git a/ChangeLog b/ChangeLog index a022b09..64284f8 100644 --- a/ChangeLog +++ b/ChangeLog @@ -1,3 +1,17 @@ +2011-10-20 Stefano Lattarini + + deps: partially revert commit `v1.11-512-g551' + This change partly

bug#8788: Weird testsuite failure on NetBSD (parallel tests, background processes)

On Tuesday 18 October 2011, Stefano Lattarini wrote: > On Tuesday 18 October 2011, Stefano Lattarini wrote: > > Reference: > > <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=8788> > > > > [SNIP] > > > > Now, the right fix for the bug is *not* to wor

bug#9546: parallel-tests: auxiliary script `test-driver' is not distributed when TESTS is defined in a subdir Makefile (regression in branch test-protocols)

On Sunday 09 October 2011, Stefano Lattarini wrote: > On Sunday 18 September 2011, Stefano Lattarini wrote: > > On Sunday 18 September 2011, Stefano Lattarini wrote: > > > Severity: serious > > > > > > The bug is demonstrated by the attached test script. >

bug#9651: Files in AC_REQUIRE_AUX_FILE aren't automatically distributed

On Sunday 09 October 2011, Stefano Lattarini wrote: > On Thursday 06 October 2011, Stefano Lattarini wrote: > > On Sunday 02 October 2011, Stefano Lattarini wrote: > > > The automake manual says: > > > > > > AC_REQUIRE_AUX_FILE > > > For each AC_R

bug#9807: libtool is not found by the automake testsuite

On Thursday 20 October 2011, Peter Rosin wrote: > Hi! > Hi Peter, thanks for the report. > When I do a simple ./configure, make, make check, Automake will > not run tests related to Libtool, because there is no Libtool > installed in the prefix this Automake is destined for (i.e. > /usr/local/). >

bug#9768: Makefile broken after removing included *.am file

On Wednesday 19 October 2011, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > * Stefano Lattarini wrote on Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 10:20:05AM CEST: > > On Sunday 16 October 2011, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > > What happens if I write > > > include fragment-with-typo-in-name.am > > > >

bug#9783: can't use special target .SUFFIXES

tags 9783 notabug close 9783 thanks On Wednesday 19 October 2011, Giulio Rossato wrote: > Feel free to close this bug report. > Thanks, > Giulio > Thanks for the quick reply. Bug closed. Regards, Stefano

bug#9320: Documentation addition: AC_SUBSTed variables do not work with LIBADD for dependency generation.

Hi Krzesimir, thanks for the report and sorry for the awful delay. On Thursday 18 August 2011, Krzesimir Nowak wrote: > Package: automake > Version: 1.11.1 > > It would be useful to add a note to "8.4 Program and Library Variables" > part of Automake documentation that Automake's dependency gener

bug#9587: Automake claims $(*F), $(

severity 9587 minor thanks Hi Nick, sorry for the delay. On Friday 23 September 2011, Nick Bowler wrote: > On 2011-09-23 15:02 -0400, Nick Bowler wrote: > > These variables are supported by (at least) bmake, pmake, dmake and GNU > > make. I can reproduce this with the following example: > > I s

bug#9783: can't use special target .SUFFIXES

On Tuesday 18 October 2011, Giulio Rossato wrote: > Putting the following target > .SUFFIXES: .c .pc > in a Makefile.am doesn't work and I get an error like this: > > src/Makefile.am:31: use variable `SUFFIXES', not target `.SUFFIXES' > > Why does it happen? > See:

bug#7833: automake uses two different values for DejaGNU srcdir

. Regards, Stefano From ded01c88c9579656cc138ce7e0b55dcf025b1a5a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 Message-Id: From: Stefano Lattarini Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2011 20:33:26 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] dejagnu: ensure 'srcdir' is defined as a relative directory This change fixes automake bug#7833.

bug#7873: Automake should support adding to DejaGnu site.exp

. Regards, Stefano From 515850a177bb2effd5d3fdb3de8b4b0f64f78dbb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 Message-Id: <515850a177bb2effd5d3fdb3de8b4b0f64f78dbb.1319012048.git.stefano.lattar...@gmail.com> From: Stefano Lattarini Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2011 09:52:43 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] dejagnu: allow the pack

bug#8788: Weird testsuite failure on NetBSD (parallel tests, background processes)

[Dropping bug-autoconf from CC] [Adding automake-patches to CC] On Tuesday 18 October 2011, Stefano Lattarini wrote: > Reference: > <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=8788> > > On Thursday 02 June 2011, Stefano Lattarini wrote: > > While teststing the `t

bug#8788: Weird testsuite failure on NetBSD (parallel tests, background processes)

Reference: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=8788> [Adding bug-autoconf in CC] On Thursday 02 June 2011, Stefano Lattarini wrote: > Hello automakers. > > While teststing the `testsuite-work' branch on NetBSD 5, I've encountered > a weird failure in th

bug#9768: Makefile broken after removing included *.am file

On Sunday 16 October 2011, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > Hello, > Hi Ralf. > * Stefano Lattarini wrote on Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 08:27:12PM CEST: > > On Sunday 15 November 2009, Peter Johansson wrote: > > > make: *** No rule to make target `aminclude.am', needed b

bug#9768: Makefile broken after removing included *.am file

e) have never been applied; anybody (ping ping Ralf ;-) knows why? Regards, Stefano From 0e8fe53d0ef3dac4901cecf5d576badb2cd6919b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 Message-Id: <0e8fe53d0ef3dac4901cecf5d576badb2cd6919b.1318789325.git.stefano.lattar...@gmail.com> From: Stefano Lattarini Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2011 14:57:37 +0200 Subject

bug#9708: aclocal -W error does not treat warnings as errors

On Sunday 09 October 2011, Křištof Želechovski wrote: > I would expect aclocal to fail and terminate the build script if warnings > appear > [1]; however, it does not happen: > > == Steps to reproduce == > { cat >configure.ac <<'#>configure.ac' && aclocal -W error && echo $?; } > AC_INIT([name],[

bug#9651: Files in AC_REQUIRE_AUX_FILE aren't automatically distributed

On Thursday 06 October 2011, Stefano Lattarini wrote: > On Sunday 02 October 2011, Stefano Lattarini wrote: > > The automake manual says: > > > > AC_REQUIRE_AUX_FILE > > For each AC_REQUIRE_AUX_FILE([file]), automake will ensure that file > > exists in the

bug#9546: parallel-tests: auxiliary script `test-driver' is not distributed when TESTS is defined in a subdir Makefile (regression in branch test-protocols)

On Sunday 18 September 2011, Stefano Lattarini wrote: > On Sunday 18 September 2011, Stefano Lattarini wrote: > > Severity: serious > > > > The bug is demonstrated by the attached test script. > > I hope I'll be able to take a look into it soonish. > >

bug#9651: Files in AC_REQUIRE_AUX_FILE aren't automatically distributed

On Sunday 02 October 2011, Stefano Lattarini wrote: > The automake manual says: > > AC_REQUIRE_AUX_FILE > For each AC_REQUIRE_AUX_FILE([file]), automake will ensure that file > exists in the aux directory, and will complain otherwise. It will also > automatically d

bug#9400: parallel-tests doesn't support `-' character in test extensions

tags 9400 patch close 9400 thanks Reference: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=9400#8> On Saturday 01 October 2011, Stefano Lattarini wrote: > For the moment, I've decided to take the easiest route, documenting the > limitation and correcting the diagnostic. Such

bug#9662: An Internal Error

tags 9662 + unreproducible close 9662 thanks On Tuesday 04 October 2011, Stefano Lattarini wrote: > On Tuesday 04 October 2011, Vahan Hakobyan wrote: > > > Unfortunately I can't send the contents of configure.ac and Makefile.am as > > they are Sonics trade secrets. > &g

bug#9658: 1 of 698 tests failed

[Re-adding the mailing list; please keep it in the loop in future] On Wednesday 05 October 2011, Thomas M wrote: > - gpg control packet > Stefano, > > I ran the test you suggested twice and it failed both time. I'll > attach both logs to this message. > (JFTR: they were basically the same as the

bug#9662: An Internal Error

On Tuesday 04 October 2011, Vahan Hakobyan wrote: > Hello Stefano, > > Thanks a lot for attention. I'll inform our folks to upgrade the automake > version to 1.11. OK, but be aware that doing so might not solve your problem; thus you, or whoever is responsible for the build system, might want to

<    5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   >