A release with LIBOBJDIR?

2006-04-01 Thread Stepan Kasal
Hello, current CVS versions of Autoconf and Automake use make variable LIBOBJDIR, to enable using AC_LIBOBJ with non-recursive makefiles. I think this is not the best possible solution to the problem. I hoped to submit an alternative solution, which would mean that LIBOBJDIR could have beed remo

Re: A release with LIBOBJDIR?

2006-04-02 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hi Stepan, * Stepan Kasal wrote on Sat, Apr 01, 2006 at 10:42:23PM CEST: > [ LIBOBJDIR ] > > That is why I'd like to ask you to consider marking the feature > as experimental, and adding a warning that it may disappear in > future releases. Could you post a patch/patches to this end? (Since this

Re: A release with LIBOBJDIR?

2006-04-02 Thread Paul Eggert
Stepan Kasal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > That is why I'd like to ask you to consider marking the feature > as experimental, and adding a warning that it may disappear in > future releases. That sounds fine to me, but we need a real patch.

Re: A release with LIBOBJDIR?

2006-04-02 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
>>> "SK" == Stepan Kasal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: SK> current CVS versions of Autoconf and Automake use make variable SK> LIBOBJDIR, to enable using AC_LIBOBJ with non-recursive makefiles. Among other uses. SK> But if we release versions with LIBOBJDIR, we will be bounded to SK> support i

Re: A release with LIBOBJDIR?

2006-04-03 Thread Stepan Kasal
Hello, On Sun, Apr 02, 2006 at 09:28:53PM +0200, Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote: > >>> "SK" == Stepan Kasal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > SK> But if we release versions with LIBOBJDIR, we will be bounded to > SK> support it in future releases, even in case that it will become > SK> redundant. > >

Re: A release with LIBOBJDIR?

2006-04-06 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Stepan Kasal wrote on Mon, Apr 03, 2006 at 10:03:16PM CEST: > On Sun, Apr 02, 2006 at 09:28:53PM +0200, Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote: > > >>> "SK" == Stepan Kasal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > SK> But if we release versions with LIBOBJDIR, we will be bounded to > > SK> support it in future rele

Re: A release with LIBOBJDIR?

2006-04-09 Thread Paul Eggert
Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > * NEWS, doc/autoconf.texi (AC_LIBOBJ vs LIBOBJS): Mark > `LIBOBJDIR' as experimental. That change looks good to me; thanks.

Re: A release with LIBOBJDIR?

2006-04-10 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Paul Eggert wrote on Sun, Apr 09, 2006 at 09:13:38AM CEST: > Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > * NEWS, doc/autoconf.texi (AC_LIBOBJ vs LIBOBJS): Mark > > `LIBOBJDIR' as experimental. > > That change looks good to me; thanks. Applied. For autoconf-patches reference, her