Hi! Thanks for the report, and sorry for the delay.
Let's try to tackle these issues one by one ...
> ERROR: self-check-cleanup
> =
> ...
> find: dummy.dir: Permission denied
> rm: dummy.dir: Permission denied
> dummy: exit 99
> + tap_result_='not ok'
> + result_ 'not ok'
On Feb 26, 2012, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
Hi! Thanks for the report, and sorry for the delay.
Let's try to tackle these issues one by one ...
> ERROR: self-check-cleanup
> =
> ...
> find: dummy.dir: Permission denied
> rm: dummy.dir: Permission denied
> dummy: exit 9
On 02/27/2012 03:38 AM, P. Martin wrote:
>
> $ mkdir a a/b
> $ chmod 000 a/b
>
Oops, my bad. I meant this:
$ mkdir a a/b
$ chmod 000 a
$ find a -type d ! -perm -700 -exec chmod u+rwx '{}' \;
$ echo exit status: $?
Sorry for the confusion and for the time I've made you waste, and thanks
f
> On Feb 26, 2012, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
> ...
> Oops, my bad. I meant this:
>
> $ mkdir a a/b
> $ chmod 000 a
> $ find a -type d ! -perm -700 -exec chmod u+rwx '{}' \;
> $ echo exit status: $?
>
> Sorry for the confusion and for the time I've made you waste, and thanks
> for your
> On Feb 28, 2012, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
>
> Yes, that's why I should have asked for "chmod 000 a/b", not "chmod 000 a" :-(
I can do that too:
$ mkdir a a/b
$ chmod 000 a/b
$ find a -type d ! -perm -700
a/b
find: a/b: Permission denied
$ echo exit status: $?
exit status: 1
$ find a -type
On 02/27/2012 11:46 PM, P. Martin wrote:
>
> $ mkdir a a/b
> $ chmod 000 a
> $ find a -type d ! -perm -700
> find: a: Permission denied
> $ echo exit status: $?
> exit status: 1
> $ find a -type d ! -perm -700 -exec chmod u+rwx '{}' \;
> find: a: Permission denied
> $ echo exit status: $?
> exit s
On 02/28/2012 10:31 PM, P. Martin wrote:
>> On Feb 28, 2012, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
>>
>> Yes, that's why I should have asked for "chmod 000 a/b", not "chmod 000 a"
>> :-(
>
> I can do that too:
>
> $ mkdir a a/b
> $ chmod 000 a/b
> $ find a -type d ! -perm -700
> a/b
> find: a/b: Permission
On 03/01/2012 10:45 PM, P. Martin wrote:
>
>
>> On Feb 29, 2012, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
>> ...
>> Thanks for the confirmation. The attached patch should fix this issue.
>> I will wait a couple of days before pushing, in case you want to give
>> it a try.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Stefano
>
>
> The
On 03/01/2012 10:45 PM, P. Martin wrote:
FAIL: java-uninstall.test
==
Running from installcheck: no
Using TAP: no
PATH =
/private/tmp/homebrew-automake-HEAD-DUdI/tests/ax:/private/tmp/homebrew-automake-HEAD-DUdI/tests/wrap:/usr/local/Cellar/libffi/3.0.10/bin:/usr/local/Ce
> On Mar 2, 2012, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
>
...
> Is perhaps your file system a case-insensitive HFS+? If yes, does
> the attached patch fix the failure?
>
> Thanks,
> Stefano
Yes it's case sensative, and your patch fixes the failure for
java-uninstall
My filesystem is the default
On 03/03/2012 04:57 AM, P. Martin wrote:
>
> On Mar 2, 2012, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
>
>> Is perhaps your file system a case-insensitive HFS+? If yes, does
>> the attached patch fix the failure?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Stefano
>
>
> Yes it's case sensitive,
>
Did you mean "insensitive" here, righ
Hi!
On 03/03/2012 10:04 AM, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
>
>> # TOTAL: 2910
>> # PASS: 2847
>> # SKIP: 21
>> # XFAIL: 41
>> # FAIL: 0
>> # XPASS: 0
>> # ERROR: 1
>>
> ... there's still this annoying error:
>
>> ERROR: get-sysconf
>> ==
>>
>> Running from installcheck: no
>> Using T
On Mar 9, 2012, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
>
> Ping on this? It would be nice to finally close this bug report, and we are
> so near to a complete solution ...
>
> Regards,
> Stefano
Certainly. It's an error building head with test 1, which displays this:
>> awk: cmd. line:2: fatal: cannot
On Mar 9, 2012, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
> Do you happen to know how one can
> reliably determine whether the build system is being run by HomeBrew,
Forgot to answer your question. Yes, when Homebrew spawns
an install, it stages the files in the user's temp dir, which can change,
but below t
Thanks for getting back to me so quickly.
On 03/10/2012 08:16 AM, P. Martin wrote:
>
> On Mar 9, 2012, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
>> Do you happen to know how one can
>> reliably determine whether the build system is being run by HomeBrew,
>
>
> Forgot to answer your question. Yes, when Homebr
On Mar 9, 2012, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
>
> Thanks for getting back to me so quickly.
>
> On 03/10/2012 08:16 AM, P. Martin wrote:
> >
> > On Mar 9, 2012, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
> >> Do you happen to know how one can
> >> reliably determine whether the build system is being run by HomeBre
On 03/11/2012 02:16 AM, P. Martin wrote:
>
> [SNIP] lots of details and good explanations
>
> Question. Why does it search for ChangeLog if that file
> doesn't exist in head?
>
Basically, the test script 'get-sysconf.test' (whose aim is collecting bits
of information to help the debugging of tests
Hi, and sorry for the delay.
On 03/12/2012 08:07 PM, P. Martin wrote:
>
> Thanks for the patch. It fixes test 1 so it skips not error.
>
Good, that is what it's supposed to do. I've pushed it now.
> [SNIP]
> Results with 1.11a d63c932 : 2 Fail, 22 Skip, 0 Error, 2910 total.
>
> Darn. Those
On Mar 14, 2012, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
>
> > FAIL: cond41.test
> ...
> Weird and annoying, the line reported in the error message is off by one ...
> I wouldn't loose my sleep on this, but it would be nice to understand the
> reason of this racy failure; so I'm keeping the bug report open.
On 03/14/2012 03:02 PM, P. Martin wrote:
> On Mar 14, 2012, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
>>
>>> FAIL: cond41.test
>> ...
>> Weird and annoying, the line reported in the error message is off by one ...
>> I wouldn't loose my sleep on this, but it would be nice to understand the
>> reason of this racy
close 10866
thanks
On 03/14/2012 10:06 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 03/14/2012 03:02 PM, P. Martin wrote:
>> On Mar 14, 2012, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
>>>
FAIL: cond41.test
>>> ...
>>> Weird and annoying, the line reported in the error message is off by one ...
>>> I wouldn't loose my sleep
On 03/01/2012 10:45 PM, P. Martin wrote:
> FAIL: vala-mix2
> ===
>
> Running from installcheck: no
> Using TAP: no
> PATH = /private/tmp/homebrew-automake-HEAD-DUdI/tests/ax:...
> vala-mix2: running valac --version
> Vala 0.15.2
> vala-mix2: determine whether make is GNU make
> GNU Mak
On 03/01/2012 10:45 PM, P. Martin wrote:
> FAIL: txinfo30
> ==
>
> Running from installcheck: no
> Using TAP: no
> PATH = /private/tmp/homebrew-automake-HEAD-DUdI/tests/ax:...
> ++ pwd
> /private/tmp/homebrew-automake-HEAD-DUdI/tests/txinfo30.dir
> + echo info_TEXINFOS = bar.texi
> + e
23 matches
Mail list logo
