On 12/27/2013 09:36 PM, Reuben Thomas wrote:
On 26 December 2013 15:39, Stefano Lattarini
stefano.lattar...@gmail.comwrote:
But AM_PROG_AR truly does not define $RANLIB itself. Perhaps you are
using libtool and calling AC_PROG_LIBTOOL or LT_INIT?
Probably. So, how about changing the
On 29 December 2013 22:24, Stefano Lattarini stefano.lattar...@gmail.comwrote:
AM_PROG_AR is only required for people interested in having their package
buildable with Microsoft tools
And we can't make AM_PROG_AR an automatic default? What would be the
downside?
(Sorry if I'm being a pain,
On 26 December 2013 15:39, Stefano Lattarini stefano.lattar...@gmail.comwrote:
But AM_PROG_AR truly does not define $RANLIB itself. Perhaps you are
using libtool and calling AC_PROG_LIBTOOL or LT_INIT?
Probably. So, how about changing the sentence from should to may need,
or is there some
tags 15949 + notabug
close 15949
thanks
On 11/21/2013 11:05 PM, Reuben Thomas wrote:
I am using automake 1.13.3. I noticed in the manual the following sentence
in the section on building static libraries, which I do for my project with
libgnu.a:
You should call 'AC_PROG_RANLIB' from your
