Stefano Lattarini stefano.lattar...@gmail.com skribis:
On 12/29/2013 10:49 PM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
[...]
However, in general, I think packages should not rely on hardcoded file
names, and instead use AC_PATH_PROG or similar mechanisms to get the
right file name.
Not in this case. The
On 12/30/2013 04:44 PM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
Stefano Lattarini stefano.lattar...@gmail.com skribis:
On 12/29/2013 10:49 PM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
[...]
However, in general, I think packages should not rely on hardcoded file
names, and instead use AC_PATH_PROG or similar mechanisms to
Stefano Lattarini stefano.lattar...@gmail.com skribis:
On 12/30/2013 04:44 PM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
Stefano Lattarini stefano.lattar...@gmail.com skribis:
On 12/29/2013 10:49 PM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
[...]
However, in general, I think packages should not rely on hardcoded file
On 12/30/2013 09:55 PM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
[MEGA-SNIP]
No; I’m asking because the tests specifically refer to /bin/rm.
What’s the reason?
Copying from my first reply:
Ludovic Courtès wrote:
Would it be possible to change these tests to use ‘rm’
instead of /bin/rm? What do
Hello!
While upgrading the GNU system to Automake 1.14.1, I noticed that a few
tests emit warnings like this:
--8---cut here---start-8---
SKIP: t/spy-rm.tap 1 # SKIP /bin/rm not found
PASS: t/spy-rm.tap 2 - rm -f
SKIP: t/spy-rm.tap 3 # SKIP /bin/rm not found
tags 16291 notabug
close 16291
stop
On 12/29/2013 10:49 PM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
Hello!
While upgrading the GNU system to Automake 1.14.1, I noticed that a few
tests emit warnings like this:
SKIPs are not warning, just informative messages explaining why some
tests couldn't be run.
