bug#35314: Bug Report

2021-02-12 Thread Karl Berry
Hi - regarding this bug report from almost two years ago (sorry). https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=35314 Here is the bug log for my last build. >From a brief glance at the attached test-suite.log, it seems the ar program on this system was missing or somehow not functional. T

bug#33420: Bug report automake 1.16.1: Says "aclocal-1.16: error: too many loops"

2018-11-18 Thread Sebastian Pipping
Hi! The output said "Please contact ." so I'm writing this e-mail... Here's how to reproduce it: # git clone https://github.com/aria2/aria2.git Cloning into 'aria2'... remote: Enumerating objects: 20, done. remote: Counting objects: 100% (20/20), done. remote: Compressing objects: 100% (16/16)

bug#30352: BUG report using autoconf…

2018-02-04 Thread Mathieu Lirzin
Hello, aotto writes: > the following line create a BUG in autoconf >> # if 'CFLAGS' is NOT set, than macro 'AC_PROG_CC' set 'CFLAGS=-g -O2' > in seems that a M4-MACRO in COMMENT is a problem. Since the issue is related to Autoconf please report it to instead. Thanks. -- Mathieu Lirzin GPG:

bug#30352: BUG report using autoconf…

2018-02-04 Thread aotto
Hi, the following line create a BUG in autoconf > # if 'CFLAGS' is NOT set, than macro 'AC_PROG_CC' set 'CFLAGS=-g -O2' in seems that a M4-MACRO in COMMENT is a problem. without this line… it works. #   then increment AGE. # #    6. If any interfaces have been removed since the last public

bug#25250: Bug report

2016-12-22 Thread Matt Postiff
aclocal-1.15: error: too many loops aclocal-1.15: Please contact . at /usr/share/automake-1.15/Automake/Channels.pm line 662. Automake::Channels::msg("automake", "", "too many loops") called at /usr/share/automake-1.15/Automake/ChannelDefs.pm line 212 Automake::ChannelDefs::prog_er

bug#17327: Bug report

2014-12-17 Thread Stefano Lattarini
retitle 17327 Automake dying with internal error: "global options already processed" tags 17327 moreinfo thanks On 04/23/2014 08:18 PM, Gallagher James wrote: OSX 10.9, automake 1.14, autoconf 2.69 autoreconf: running: automake --add-missing --copy --force-missing automake: error: global optio

bug#17327: Bug report

2014-04-23 Thread Gallagher James
OSX 10.9, automake 1.14, autoconf 2.69 autoreconf: running: automake --add-missing --copy --force-missing automake: error: global options already processed automake: Please contact . at /usr/local/share/automake-1.14/Automake/Channels.pm line 662, line 109. Automake::Channels::msg('auto

bug#14309: Spurious bug report, ignore

2013-04-29 Thread Stefano Lattarini
Oops, erroneously created while dealing with bug#12254. Please ignore, and sorry for the noise, Stefano

bug#14315: Spurious bug report, opened by mistake

2013-04-29 Thread Stefano Lattarini
tags 14315 notabug close 14315 stop Oops, erroneously created while dealing with bug#12254. Please ignore, and sorry for the noise, Stefano

bug#13988: bug report

2013-04-19 Thread Stefano Lattarini
tags 13988 notabug tags 13988 wontfix close 13988 stop Hello Behzad, thanks for the report. On 03/17/2013 06:20 PM, riddl...@gmail.com wrote: > Greetings, > > I am reporting bug report for "make check" output. > All the failures reported in the attaches test-suite.log ar

bug#11803: close bug report

2012-07-14 Thread Stefano Lattarini
severity 11803 minor close 11803 thanks Oops, I forgot to close this bug when we fixed it. Closing it now. Stefano

bug#10462: Bug Report - Building all tools in 64Bit on Solaris 10.

2012-03-27 Thread Stefano Lattarini
On 03/02/2012 09:36 PM, Stefano Lattarini wrote: > > The issue you have encountered is just a testsuite weakness; nothing you > should really worry about, since it is not a symptom of any real automake > bug. And it should now be solved in the master branch. > > I will wait a week or so before cl

bug#10462: Bug Report - Building all tools in 64Bit on Solaris 10.

2012-03-02 Thread Stefano Lattarini
On 01/11/2012 07:16 PM, Stefano Lattarini wrote: > tags 10462 minor > thanks > > Hi Robert, thanks for the report. > > On 01/09/2012 08:19 AM, ROBERT JONES wrote: >> See below. The bottom line is the reset of CFLAGS to remove the -m64 for >> compiles that link Tests that didn't fail didn't

bug#10671: Automake 1.11 Test Suite Bug Report

2012-02-07 Thread Matthew Wezowicz
FAIL 2 > > + st=1 > > + exit 1 > > > Ah ah! So this is an issue with your compiler, not with Automake (good > for us, bad for you I guess ;-). In fact, the script should work if you > compiler truly gave precedence to the files residing in directories > specified with

bug#10671: Automake 1.11 Test Suite Bug Report

2012-02-07 Thread Stefano Lattarini
s an issue with your compiler, not with Automake (good for us, bad for you I guess ;-). In fact, the script should work if you compiler truly gave precedence to the files residing in directories specified with earlier '-I' options (as it does on my system). I'm thus closing th

bug#10671: Automake 1.11 Test Suite Bug Report

2012-02-07 Thread Matthew Wezowicz
The script prints the following to the console: + mkdir am.dir + cd am.dir + cat + echo 'int bar () { return 0; }' + mkdir sub + echo 'choke me' + st=0 + gcc -I. -I./sub -c -o foo.o foo.c In file included from foo.c:1: ./sub/bar.h:1: error: expected `=', `,', `;', `asm' or `__attribute__' before `

bug#10671: Automake 1.11 Test Suite Bug Report

2012-02-07 Thread Stefano Lattarini
Hi Matthew, sorry for the delay. On 02/01/2012 06:53 PM, Matthew Wezowicz wrote: > All bits may have been accidentally set when I scp'ed stdinc.dir to my > Windows machine for inspection. > I sent the .tar from it. > > I believe the SELinux is installed by default on CentOS 6.2 and I didn't > cha

bug#10671: Automake 1.11 Test Suite Bug Report

2012-02-01 Thread Stefano Lattarini
On 02/01/2012 10:22 AM, Peter Rosin wrote: > > I thought you read the libtool lists and also assumed Matthew would > get back with the info from the other list, so I didn't speak up. > Anyway, have a look at this libttol bug: > http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=10672 > Thanks for the poi

bug#10671: Automake 1.11 Test Suite Bug Report

2012-02-01 Thread Peter Rosin
Stefano Lattarini skrev 2012-02-01 09:49: > On 01/31/2012 09:15 PM, Matthew Wezowicz wrote: >> The OS is CentOS 6.2 x86_64 >> Kernel Version: 2.6.32-220.4.1.el6.x86_64 >> GCC Version: 4.4.6 >> Autconf Version: 2.68 >> Libtool Version: 2.4 >> >> The stdinc.dir and stdinc.log are attached as a .tar.

bug#10671: Automake 1.11 Test Suite Bug Report

2012-02-01 Thread Stefano Lattarini
On 01/31/2012 09:15 PM, Matthew Wezowicz wrote: > The OS is CentOS 6.2 x86_64 > Kernel Version: 2.6.32-220.4.1.el6.x86_64 > GCC Version: 4.4.6 > Autconf Version: 2.68 > Libtool Version: 2.4 > > The stdinc.dir and stdinc.log are attached as a .tar. > Thanks. However, I still cannot reproduce the p

bug#10671: Automake 1.11 Test Suite Bug Report

2012-01-31 Thread Stefano Lattarini
[Re-adding the list in CC:] [Please don't drop it in future replies. Thanks.] On 01/31/2012 07:46 PM, Matthew Wezowicz wrote: > I ran the test three more times. > All runs failed. > I have attached the logs. > > Do you need any more information about the specific system set-up I'm using? > Yes,

bug#10671: Automake 1.11 Test Suite Bug Report

2012-01-31 Thread Stefano Lattarini
tags 10671 + moreinfo severity 10671 minor thanks Hi Matthew, thanks for the report. On 01/31/2012 03:47 AM, Matthew Wezowicz wrote: > Bug encountered in Automake 1.11 Test Suite run. > Consider that 1.11 is already some years old, and, most importantly, suffers from a know security vulnerability

bug#10462: Bug Report - Building all tools in 64Bit on Solaris 10.

2012-01-11 Thread Stefano Lattarini
s built when CFLAGS was untouched. > > Robert W. Jones > The issue you have encountered is just a testsuite weakness; nothing you should really worry about, since it is not a symptom of any real automake bug. Still, I'm not closing this bug report yet, since work is underway to improve

bug#10462: Bug Report - Building all tools in 64Bit on Solaris 10.

2012-01-09 Thread ROBERT JONES
See below. The bottom line is the reset of CFLAGS to remove the -m64 for compiles that link Tests that didn't fail didn't have to link with anything else that was built when CFLAGS was untouched. Robert W. Jones gfp-ip@gfpmtipb:pts9:/build_tools/tools/build/automake-1.11.1/tests $ grep "^

bug#9658: bug report reopened

2012-01-04 Thread Stefano Lattarini
tags 9658 wontfix close 9658 thanks On 12/30/2011 03:03 PM, Stefano Lattarini wrote: > It turns out that this failure wasn't a spurious one after all: > > <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/automake/2011-12/msg00025.html> > > I've thus reopened the bug repor

bug#7352: bug report

2010-11-15 Thread Stefano Lattarini
Hi Jeff. On Sunday 07 November 2010, Jeff Hammond wrote: > I suck for taking so long to respond, but I attempted to verify my > error and cannot, meaning that after a variety of updates and a new > pass at building automake-1.11, everything is fine, i.e. all the "make > check" tests are passing. >

bug#7352: bug report

2010-11-07 Thread Jeff Hammond
I suck for taking so long to respond, but I attempted to verify my error and cannot, meaning that after a variety of updates and a new pass at building automake-1.11, everything is fine, i.e. all the "make check" tests are passing. Jeff On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 5:18 AM, Stefano Lattarini wrote: >

Re: bug report

2010-08-11 Thread Stefano Lattarini
Hi Jeff, thanks for the report. > FAIL: acloca22.test (exit: 1) This seems like a weird failure, no clue what the cause might be... could you please try to run the test by hand to see if the failure is still there? You can do something like this: $ cd /software/source/automake-1.11/tests/ $

bug report

2010-08-09 Thread Jeff Hammond
Not sure how to do this, but config.log should contain system-dependent info. Jeff -- Jeff Hammond Argonne Leadership Computing Facility jhamm...@alcf.anl.gov / (630) 252-5381 http://www.linkedin.com/in/jeffhammond = GNU Automake 1.11: tests/test-su

Re: bug report

2007-10-14 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hello Kyoji, Thanks for the report. * Kyoji Kamei wrote on Sun, Oct 14, 2007 at 11:31:13PM CEST: > XFAIL: cond17.test This is not a problem: XFAILs are expected failures. So everything is going right here, only FAILs and XPASSes (unexpected passes) are problematic. Cheers, Ralf

bug report

2007-10-14 Thread Kyoji Kamei
XFAIL: cond17.test

Requested Bug Report

2005-06-01 Thread Altmann Michael EXT
Hi folks, here is a bug report as requested in configure's log output: configure: WARNING: net/if.h: present but cannot be compiled configure: WARNING: net/if.h: check for missing prerequisite headers? configure: WARNING: net/if.h: see the Autoconf documentation configure: WARNING: net