Linda Walsh wrote:
> Would it be a bad thing to set mail-list software to automatically
> default to the list as the 'default' response, and the user would
> have to address an email, manually, to not respond to the list?
If there were a good mail header to use then it would be a good thing.
But t
Saw these come not far apart -- and I had to "restart" an email or two when I
noticed that pressing "reply" didn't go to the list as it does on some lists.
Bob Proulx wrote:
Please keep the mailing list in the CC so that others may participate
in the discussion and enable it to be available in t
I was wondering about a possible RFE and whether or not
it is "inadvisable" or not. I'd be surprised if no one had
thought of it -- so maybe there is a problem in doing it.
Just like:
&>word#(preferred syntax)
and
>&word
are semantically equivalent to ">word 2>&1"
Has it be
davedoom wrote:
> I am trying to learn to write recursive functions in bash. As one of my
> first attempts i wrote this program to emulate the system provided tac
> command:
>
> after playing with it for a good bit, it no longer produces this error
> message:
> malloc: ../bash/subst.c:4135: asser
