On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 1:14 PM, Ralf Goertz
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> is it possible to have a process substitution with both input and output
> redirection? So far I use the following work-around
>
> > cat parentprocess.sh:
> #!/bin/bash
> mkfifo fifo 2>/dev/null
> exec 5> >(./subprocess.sh > fifo)
> exe
I am creating a web site with AIX installp images (instead of RPMs).
bash 3.2.48 is now available. The path to the base web site is
http://aix-consulting.net
Enjoy,
Perry
Ease Software, Inc. ( http://www.easesoftware.com )
Low cost SATA Disk Systems for IBMs p5, pSeries, and RS/6000 AIX syste
Hi,
is it possible to have a process substitution with both input and output
redirection? So far I use the following work-around
> cat parentprocess.sh:
#!/bin/bash
mkfifo fifo 2>/dev/null
exec 5> >(./subprocess.sh > fifo)
exec 6< <(cat < fifo)
echo input to subprocess 1>&5
echo done sending inpu
Greg Wooledge wrote:
> Bob Proulx wrote:
> > I would think help-gnu-ut...@gnu.org would be the better place to ask
> > for help about GNU utilities. :-)
>
> We don't know that he's using GNU sed.
True, we don't know for sure. But I think it likely that it is GNU
sed given the behavior. Plus ei
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 12:24:30PM -0600, Bob Proulx wrote:
> Pierre Gaston wrote:
> > Please consider asking in a sed mailing list like:
> > http://sed.sourceforge.net/#mailing
> > or maybe in the usenet group comp.unix.shell
>
> I would think help-gnu-ut...@gnu.org would be the better place to a
Pierre Gaston wrote:
> Please consider asking in a sed mailing list like:
> http://sed.sourceforge.net/#mailing
> or maybe in the usenet group comp.unix.shell
I would think help-gnu-ut...@gnu.org would be the better place to ask
for help about GNU utilities. :-)
Bob
I am creating a web site with AIX installp images (instead of RPMs).
bash 3.2.48 is now available. The path to the base web site is
http://aix-consulting.net
Enjoy,
Perry
Ease Software, Inc. ( http://www.easesoftware.com )
Low cost SATA Disk Systems for IBMs p5, pSeries, and RS/6000 AIX syste
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 3:27 PM, henter2009
wrote:
>
> I have the following question about sed and methacaracters:
>
> This mailing list is mainly about the development, the features and the
bugs of bash.
sed is not really related to the shell, except that you often use it in bash
and in scripts.
I have the following question about sed and methacaracters:
In the eg number 1, I escaped the +, to get any matches with 1 plus (1 or
more characters)
In the eg number 2, I escaped the *, to get any matches with 0 or more
characters, but it scape the * and takes it at literal.
Why it doesn't tak
