Re: Yet Another test option

2011-07-03 Thread Bob Proulx
Bruce Korb wrote: > I wouldn't know. I use it myself a bit and I am now playing with > Lustre fs code where they get it wrong because it is inconvenient to > get it right. After seeing that, I thought I'd suggest it. > ... > P.S. this check is really for any version below 2.6.27: > > - case

Re: Yet Another test option

2011-07-03 Thread Bruce Korb
Hi Chet, On Sun, Jul 3, 2011 at 11:21 AM, Chet Ramey wrote: > On 7/2/11 3:49 PM, Bruce Korb wrote: >> Hi Chet, et al., >> >> Given that sort(1GNU) now has a sort-by-version-ordering (sort -V), >> it would seem reasonable to do version comparisons without having >> to do a series of fork & execs.

Re: Yet Another test option

2011-07-03 Thread Chet Ramey
On 7/2/11 3:49 PM, Bruce Korb wrote: > Hi Chet, et al., > > Given that sort(1GNU) now has a sort-by-version-ordering (sort -V), > it would seem reasonable to do version comparisons without having > to do a series of fork & execs. In other words, abbreviate this: > > min_os_ver=` > prin