On Fri, Apr 9, 2021, at 4:51 PM, Eli Schwartz wrote:
> Are you ready to have your day truly spoiled? Fedora's package for the
> external program GNU which, provides this /etc/profile.d/ script
> (automatically injected into the environment of any interactive shell
> sessions once you install GNU wh
On 4/9/21 4:22 PM, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 09, 2021 at 03:08:25PM -0400, Craig Andrews wrote:
>> Description:
>> With "set -u", invoking "which" results in the output of:
>> environment: line 1: _declare: unboundvariable
>> That should not happen, and does not happen, wit
On 4/9/21 3:08 PM, Craig Andrews wrote:
Bash Version: 5.1
Patch Level: 0
Release Status: release
Description:
With "set -u", invoking "which" results in the output of:
environment: line 1: _declare: unboundvariable
That should not happen, and does not happen, with prior versi
On Fri, Apr 09, 2021 at 03:08:25PM -0400, Craig Andrews wrote:
> Description:
> With "set -u", invoking "which" results in the output of:
> environment: line 1: _declare: unboundvariable
> That should not happen, and does not happen, with prior versions of
> bash.
> I'm usin
On Sat, Apr 10, 2021 at 4:08 AM Craig Andrews wrote:
> Repeat-By:
> Run this shell script:
> #!/bin/bash
> set -u
> echo "$(which bash)"
Tested with vanilla bash 5.1.0 it works well with `/bin/bash` as
output. Maybe one of your builtins or external commands is
Configuration Information [Automatically generated, do not change]:
Machine: x86_64
OS: linux-gnu
Compiler: gcc
Compilation CFLAGS: -O2 -flto=auto -ffat-lto-objects -fexceptions -g
-grecord-gcc-switches -pipe -Wall -Werror=format-security
-Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -Wp,-D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS
-specs
On Fri, Apr 9, 2021 at 8:17 PM Greg Wooledge wrote:
> How can you look at that code and call it anything other than a hack?
> It's a piece of pure desperation. You can only READ the array, not write
> to it. You can't do an index iteration, either -- only a value iteration.
> And you still have
.2021年4月9日(金) 23:53 Chet Ramey :
> On 4/8/21 6:23 PM, Koichi Murase wrote:
> > I currently don't have any better idea, but in that way, it seems to
> > me that there is no way to represent a reference to an element
> > associated with key=@ under the new `assoc_expand_once', which was
> > what I wa
On 4/8/21 6:23 PM, Koichi Murase wrote:
I currently don't have any better idea, but in that way, it seems to
me that there is no way to represent a reference to an element
associated with key=@ under the new `assoc_expand_once', which was
what I wanted to argue in my previous reply.
Under wh
On Fri, Apr 09, 2021 at 08:17:52AM +0800, konsolebox wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 9, 2021 at 4:08 AM Greg Wooledge wrote:
> > But apparently someone stumbled upon this trick, and passed it around,
> > and now there's a whole subculture of people who use this as a hack for
> > trying to pass array variable
10 matches
Mail list logo
