On Mon, Oct 16, 2023, 22:46 Christoph Anton Mitterer
wrote:
> Hey.
>
> On Mon, 2023-10-16 at 22:05 -0400, Lawrence Velázquez wrote:
> > Under no circumstances should your examples complain about "array"
> > because they do not attempt to expand it. As I demonstrated, your
> > examples do not eve
Hey.
On Mon, 2023-10-16 at 22:05 -0400, Lawrence Velázquez wrote:
> Under no circumstances should your examples complain about "array"
> because they do not attempt to expand it. As I demonstrated, your
> examples do not even complain about unset scalar variables.
Okay I realise now, why it work
On Mon, Oct 16, 2023, at 9:06 PM, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
> $ set -u
> $ [ -n "${array[key]+is_set}" ] && echo is set || echo not set
> bash: key: unbound variable
> $ [[ -v array[key] ]] && echo is set || echo not set
> bash: key: unbound variable
Since "array" has not been declared at th
Hey.
On 5.2.15 I've noticed the following:
$ set -u
$ [ -n "${array[key]+is_set}" ] && echo is set || echo not set
bash: key: unbound variable
$ [[ -v array[key] ]] && echo is set || echo not set
bash: key: unbound variable
$ declare -A array
$ [ -n "${array[key]+is_set}" ] && echo is set || ech
On Wed, Oct 11, 2023 at 04:08:55AM -0500, G. Branden Robinson wrote:
> Hi Chet,
>
> Please consider reverting the following recent changes to the bash man
> page. Bjarni should have run them by the groff list first, because some
> of them are ill-considered.
>
> Bjarni,
>
> I regret that I must
On 10/13/23 9:59 AM, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
Hi,
For reports concerning the bash manual, the tarballs (5.2, 5.2.15)
and the Git repository say to Chet Ramey's address (both in the
man page and in the HTML file). But
https://www.gnu.org/software/bash/manual/html_node/Reporting-Bugs.html
says
On 10/14/23 12:03 PM, Robert Elz wrote:
However in the case of a special built-in utility (which "." is) then
the requirements are much stricter:
� If the command name is a special built-in utility, variable assignments
shall affect the current execution environment before the utility i
On 10/15/23 12:31 AM, Martin D Kealey wrote:
On Sun, 15 Oct 2023, 03:15 Ti Strga, wrote:
I think I would attack this from an entirely different angle: what about
simply modifying Baeh so that it slurps in the entire file upon opening it?
Bash reads up to 8K at a time, minus bookkeeping over
On 10/15/23 12:24 AM, Martin D Kealey wrote:
On Sun, 15 Oct 2023, 03:05 Greg Wooledge, wrote:
On Sat, Oct 14, 2023 at 12:55:21PM -0400, Ti Strga wrote:
it's just the "[[ -v foo ]]" tests to see where along the cloning
process we are.
*Shudder*
Likewise, b.
If the *real* goal is to o
On 10/14/23 12:46 AM, Martin D Kealey wrote:
Respectfully I must disagree.
This aspect of Bash's behaviour has a very long historical precedent.
Back when I used the Bourne Shell we didn't have `local`, so we used to
write `var= func` to make sure that `func` couldn't mess with *our* `var`.
10 matches
Mail list logo
