On 8/3/10 5:23 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
> But why not teach the matcher the difference between a fixed-length
> pattern, vs. one that has * or other extended globbing that would cause
> a variable length match? That is, since you know that [^;] can match at
> most one character, there is no need to
On 08/03/2010 03:12 PM, Chet Ramey wrote:
> On 7/12/10 4:27 PM, Yi Yan wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I used the following Bash script to test substring replacement operator.
>> It is performance get worse very quickly with the increasing of the string
>> length.
>
> This is a pathological case. I d
On 7/12/10 4:27 PM, Yi Yan wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I used the following Bash script to test substring replacement operator.
> It is performance get worse very quickly with the increasing of the string
> length.
This is a pathological case. I don't really see how to optimize it very
well. The p
Yi Yan wrote:
Hi,
I used the following Bash script to test substring replacement operator.
It is performance get worse very quickly with the increasing of the string
length.
I test the script with Bash(4.1) on Debian Linux machine.
See the execution time difference by increasing
Hi,
I used the following Bash script to test substring replacement operator.
It is performance get worse very quickly with the increasing of the string
length.
I test the script with Bash(4.1) on Debian Linux machine.
See the execution time difference by increasing the $NUM in the
