Hi,
> > Bash is one of the components we follow closely, so I'll be filing
> > internal bugs to update to latest patch level tomorrow. The Makefile
> > lists requirements
> >
> > REQUIRED_PACKAGES += library/ncurses
> > REQUIRED_PACKAGES += shell/ksh93
> > REQUIRED_PACKAGES += terminal/screen
> >
On 4/22/19 1:54 PM, Vladimir Marek wrote:
> Bash is one of the components we follow closely, so I'll be filing
> internal bugs to update to latest patch level tomorrow. The Makefile
> lists requirements
>
> REQUIRED_PACKAGES += library/ncurses
> REQUIRED_PACKAGES += shell/ksh93
> REQUIRED_PACKAGE
On 4/22/19 12:54 PM, Dennis Clarke wrote:
> On 4/22/19 9:53 AM, Chet Ramey wrote:
>> BASH PATCH REPORT
>> =
>>
>> Bash-Release: 5.0
>> Patch-ID: bash50-007
>>
>
> I see these are all published in the gnu ftp server :
>
> https://ftp.gnu.
> >>I don't think bash 5 has hit Debian sid yet. As for "commercial" UNIX
> >>like Solaris, well, that platform is on life support and a nightmare to
> >>deal with. So no sense in wasting time there anymore.
> >
> >I'm sorry to hear that Solaris is a nightmare. Solaris 11.4 (the current
> >supporte
On 4/22/19 1:54 PM, Vladimir Marek wrote:
Hi,
I don't think bash 5 has hit Debian sid yet. As for "commercial" UNIX
like Solaris, well, that platform is on life support and a nightmare to
deal with. So no sense in wasting time there anymore.
I'm sorry to hear that Solaris is a nightmare. Sola
Hi,
> I don't think bash 5 has hit Debian sid yet. As for "commercial" UNIX
> like Solaris, well, that platform is on life support and a nightmare to
> deal with. So no sense in wasting time there anymore.
I'm sorry to hear that Solaris is a nightmare. Solaris 11.4 (the current
supported version)
On 4/22/19 1:26 PM, Greg Wooledge wrote:
On Mon, Apr 22, 2019 at 01:21:38PM -0400, Dennis Clarke wrote:
I don't think bash 5 has hit Debian sid yet.
It's not only in sid; it's also in buster.
Here's the relevant excerpt from the changelog:
bash (5.0-1) unstable; urgency=medium
Well golly
On Mon, Apr 22, 2019 at 01:21:38PM -0400, Dennis Clarke wrote:
> I don't think bash 5 has hit Debian sid yet.
It's not only in sid; it's also in buster.
Here's the relevant excerpt from the changelog:
bash (5.0-1) unstable; urgency=medium
* New upstream release.
-- Matthias Klose Mon, 14
On 4/22/19 1:01 PM, Greg Wooledge wrote:
On Mon, Apr 22, 2019 at 12:54:28PM -0400, Dennis Clarke wrote:
I see these are all published in the gnu ftp server :
https://ftp.gnu.org/pub/gnu/bash/bash-5.0-patches/
So I will try again from the sources but am curious if there is a definitive
lis
On Mon, Apr 22, 2019 at 12:54:28PM -0400, Dennis Clarke wrote:
> I see these are all published in the gnu ftp server :
>
> https://ftp.gnu.org/pub/gnu/bash/bash-5.0-patches/
>
> So I will try again from the sources but am curious if there is a definitive
> list of dependencies that bash 5.0.7
On 4/22/19 9:53 AM, Chet Ramey wrote:
BASH PATCH REPORT
=
Bash-Release: 5.0
Patch-ID: bash50-007
I see these are all published in the gnu ftp server :
https://ftp.gnu.org/pub/gnu/bash/bash-5.0-patches/
So
BASH PATCH REPORT
=
Bash-Release: 5.0
Patch-ID: bash50-007
Bug-Reported-by:Grisha Levit
Bug-Reference-ID:
Bug-Reference-URL:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-bash/2019-02/msg00067.html
B
12 matches
Mail list logo
