On 8/28/22 10:47 AM, Yair Lenga wrote:
Hi,
I've noticed Bash code uses "old-style" C89 declarations:
* Parameters are separated from the prototype
Changing to C99-style function declarations is something that's on the list
to do.
* Variables declared only at the beginning of the function
* N
On Mon, 29 Aug 2022 at 09:14, Dmitry Goncharov
wrote:
> On Sunday, August 28, 2022, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> > Note that the next revision of the C standard removes support for K&R
> > declarations
>
> The code will continue to compile, won't it?
>
I expect "gcc -std=c23" will reject such code.
On Sunday, August 28, 2022, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> On Aug 28 2022, Greg Wooledge wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Aug 28, 2022 at 10:47:38AM -0400, Yair Lenga wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I've noticed Bash code uses "old-style" C89 declarations:
> >> * Parameters are separated from the prototype
> >> * Variabl
On Aug 28 2022, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 28, 2022 at 10:47:38AM -0400, Yair Lenga wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've noticed Bash code uses "old-style" C89 declarations:
>> * Parameters are separated from the prototype
>> * Variables declared only at the beginning of the function
>> * No mixed de
On Sun, Aug 28, 2022 at 10:47:38AM -0400, Yair Lenga wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've noticed Bash code uses "old-style" C89 declarations:
> * Parameters are separated from the prototype
> * Variables declared only at the beginning of the function
> * No mixed declaration/statements
> * No block local variab
Hi,
I've noticed Bash code uses "old-style" C89 declarations:
* Parameters are separated from the prototype
* Variables declared only at the beginning of the function
* No mixed declaration/statements
* No block local variables
intmax_t
evalexp (expr, flags, validp)
char *expr;
int flag
