- Original Message -
> From: "Marty E. Plummer"
> To: "Chet Ramey"
> Cc: bash-annou...@gnu.org, bug-bash@gnu.org
> Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2018 3:08:57 AM
> Subject: Re: Bash patches format
>
> Well, as I said, debian and fedora convert to
On 5/30/2018 02:04, Marty E. Plummer wrote:
> On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 10:42:27AM +0800, Clark Wang wrote:
>> On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 8:25 AM, Marty E. Plummer
>> wrote:
>>
If people are willing to do the conversion between patch formats for
>>> their
own purposes, more power to them. I
pkgsrc (for NetBSD and other systems) has no listed bash maintainer, so ...
(and please understand that I in no way speak for pkgsrc or NetBSD here).
As long as patch(1) can handle the format, which form (context, unified, ...)
patches are released in makes no difference at all.
pkgsrc defaults
On 2018-05-30 09:04, Marty E. Plummer wrote:
> Maintainers, I'd really like to hear your thoughts on this matter. If
> the diffs are produced as -p1 unified diffs, then downstreams who do
> convert from -p0 context won't have to, and distros who work around it
> won't either.
Speaking as
On 05/30/2018 02:04 AM, Marty E. Plummer wrote:
Maintainers, I'd really like to hear your thoughts on this matter. If
the diffs are produced as -p1 unified diffs, then downstreams who do
convert from -p0 context won't have to, and distros who work around it
won't either.
Makes no real
On 2018-05-30 09:04, Marty E. Plummer wrote:
> Maintainers, I'd really like to hear your thoughts on this matter. If
> the diffs are produced as -p1 unified diffs, then downstreams who do
> convert from -p0 context won't have to, and distros who work around it
> won't either.
>
> Regards,
>
>
"Marty E. Plummer" wrote:
> Maintainers, I'd really like to hear your thoughts on this matter. If
> the diffs are produced as -p1 unified diffs, then downstreams who do
> convert from -p0 context won't have to, and distros who work around it
> won't either.
Alpine Linux uses -p1 and unified
Marty E. Plummer wrote:
> On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 09:15:04AM -0400, Chet Ramey wrote:
>> On 5/29/18 8:25 PM, Marty E. Plummer wrote:
>>
If people are willing to do the conversion between patch formats for their
own purposes, more power to them. I don't see any compelling reason to
Chet Ramey wrote:
> On 5/29/18 11:44 PM, Todd Zullinger wrote:
>
>> The main difference is the lack of detail in the git commit
>> message. It would great if the same data found in the
>> bash44-019 patch file was added to the git commit message.
>
> This is certainly doable. I would just have
On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 04:59:15PM +0200, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
> Marty E. Plummer:
>
> > Maintainers, I'd really like to hear your thoughts on this matter. If
> > the diffs are produced as -p1 unified diffs, then downstreams who do
> > convert from -p0 context won't have to, and distros
On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 09:15:04AM -0400, Chet Ramey wrote:
> On 5/29/18 8:25 PM, Marty E. Plummer wrote:
>
> >> If people are willing to do the conversion between patch formats for their
> >> own purposes, more power to them. I don't see any compelling reason to
> >> change the format I use.
>
Marty E. Plummer:
> Maintainers, I'd really like to hear your thoughts on this matter. If
> the diffs are produced as -p1 unified diffs, then downstreams who do
> convert from -p0 context won't have to, and distros who work around it
> won't either.
Speaking in my capacity as the OpenBSD
On 5/29/18 11:44 PM, Todd Zullinger wrote:
> The main difference is the lack of detail in the git commit
> message. It would great if the same data found in the
> bash44-019 patch file was added to the git commit message.
This is certainly doable. I would just have to change the script I use.
On 5/29/18 8:25 PM, Marty E. Plummer wrote:
>> If people are willing to do the conversion between patch formats for their
>> own purposes, more power to them. I don't see any compelling reason to
>> change the format I use.
>>
> Could I at least convince you to start doing -p1, if not unified?
On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 10:30:10AM +0200, Emanuel Haupt wrote:
> "Marty E. Plummer" wrote:
> > On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 10:42:27AM +0800, Clark Wang wrote:
> > > On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 8:25 AM, Marty E. Plummer
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > > If people are willing to do the conversion between
> > > > If people are willing to do the conversion between patch formats for
> > > their
> > > > own purposes, more power to them. I don't see any compelling reason to
> > > > change the format I use.
> > > >
> > > Could I at least convince you to start doing -p1, if not unified?
> > >
> >
> > I
"Marty E. Plummer" wrote:
> On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 10:42:27AM +0800, Clark Wang wrote:
> > On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 8:25 AM, Marty E. Plummer
> > wrote:
> >
> > > > If people are willing to do the conversion between patch
> > > > formats for
> > > their
> > > > own purposes, more power to them.
Hi,
Marty E. Plummer wrote:
>> If people are willing to do the conversion between patch formats for their
>> own purposes, more power to them. I don't see any compelling reason to
>> change the format I use.
>>
> Could I at least convince you to start doing -p1, if not unified?
Don't we
On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 10:42:27AM +0800, Clark Wang wrote:
> On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 8:25 AM, Marty E. Plummer
> wrote:
>
> > > If people are willing to do the conversion between patch formats for
> > their
> > > own purposes, more power to them. I don't see any compelling reason to
> > >
On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 8:25 AM, Marty E. Plummer
wrote:
> > If people are willing to do the conversion between patch formats for
> their
> > own purposes, more power to them. I don't see any compelling reason to
> > change the format I use.
> >
> Could I at least convince you to start doing
On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 11:05:45AM -0400, Chet Ramey wrote:
> On 5/19/18 9:46 AM, Marty E. Plummer wrote:
> > Greetings,
> >
> > In doing some research into ways to better improve the gentoo ebuild qa,
> > I ran across the fact that the official bash patches are provided as
> > -p0, context
On 5/19/18 9:46 AM, Marty E. Plummer wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> In doing some research into ways to better improve the gentoo ebuild qa,
> I ran across the fact that the official bash patches are provided as
> -p0, context diffs.
>
> I was hoping I could convince you to convert to -p1, unified
Greetings,
In doing some research into ways to better improve the gentoo ebuild qa,
I ran across the fact that the official bash patches are provided as
-p0, context diffs.
I was hoping I could convince you to convert to -p1, unified diffs, such
as are produced by diff -u or git format-patch,
23 matches
Mail list logo
