Re: Unbuffered pipes: cases to be supported

2020-04-27 Thread Dale R. Worley
Angel writes: > On 2020-04-23 at 20:20 -0400, Dale R. Worley wrote: >> The cases I've found where bash allocates a pipe, and thus an unbuffered >> pipe may be wanted, are: > > What are you trying to solve? How do you expect those "Unbuffered pipes" > to be implemented? > I don't think there is any

Re: Unbuffered pipes: cases to be supported

2020-04-25 Thread Ángel
On 2020-04-23 at 20:20 -0400, Dale R. Worley wrote: > The cases I've found where bash allocates a pipe, and thus an unbuffered > pipe may be wanted, are: What are you trying to solve? How do you expect those "Unbuffered pipes" to be implemented? I don't think there is any buffering going on in the

Unbuffered pipes: cases to be supported

2020-04-23 Thread Dale R. Worley
The cases I've found where bash allocates a pipe, and thus an unbuffered pipe may be wanted, are: 1. pipelines: command1 | command2 By analogy with the cases below, I think the demo should be amended to use this syntax: command1 >>| command2 and the parallel for redirecting both stdout and