On 7/11/15 4:15 PM, Bill Parker wrote:
> The comment above the line would seem to indicate otherwise:
>
> Here is the comment:
>
>/* Now erase the contents of the current line and undo the effects of the
> rl_accept_line() above. We don't even want to make the text we just
> exec
The comment above the line would seem to indicate otherwise:
Here is the comment:
/* Now erase the contents of the current line and undo the effects of the
rl_accept_line() above. We don't even want to make the text we just
executed available for undoing. */
Bill
On Fri, Jul 10,
On Thu, Jul 09, 2015 at 01:53:52PM -0700, Bill Parker wrote:
> Hello All,
>
>In reviewing the code at line 990 in bashfile.c, while the
> issue of rl_line_buffer[0] = '\0', would it not be better to
> use memset(rl_line_buffer, '\0', sizeof(rl_line_buffer)) to
> clobber the entire line more ef
Hello All,
In reviewing the code at line 990 in bashfile.c, while the
issue of rl_line_buffer[0] = '\0', would it not be better to
use memset(rl_line_buffer, '\0', sizeof(rl_line_buffer)) to
clobber the entire line more effectively? The patch file
below addresses this issue:
--- bashline.c.or
