Re: bash 4.4 - (readline) regression in the behaviour of ^W in vi-mode

2017-03-05 Thread Gian Piero Carrubba
* Please cc me as I'm not subscribed. * [Sun, Mar 05, 2017 at 06:37:23PM +0100] Gian Piero Carrubba: In other words, the interval of chars to be deleted is (stop,start]. Well, not exactly. It is either (stop,start] OR [stop,start], depending on if the stop char is at the end of a word (first

Re: bash 4.4 - (readline) regression in the behaviour of ^W in vi-mode

2017-03-05 Thread Gian Piero Carrubba
* Please cc me as I'm not subscribed. * [Sat, Mar 04, 2017 at 02:26:04PM -0500] Chet Ramey: The Posix description of ^W in vi mode reads: "Delete the characters from the one preceding the cursor to the preceding word boundary. The word boundary in this case is the closer to the cursor of either

Re: bash 4.4 - (readline) regression in the behaviour of ^W in vi-mode

2017-03-04 Thread Chet Ramey
On 3/3/17 3:30 PM, Gian Piero Carrubba wrote: > * Please cc me as I'm not subscribed. > > * [Fri, Mar 03, 2017 at 09:38:04AM -0500] Chet Ramey: >> On 3/3/17 5:47 AM, Gian Piero Carrubba wrote: >>> Hello all, >>> >>> this is a copy of Debian bug 838437 [0]. I'm posting it here because I >>> failed

Re: bash 4.4 - (readline) regression in the behaviour of ^W in vi-mode

2017-03-03 Thread Gian Piero Carrubba
* Please cc me as I'm not subscribed. * [Fri, Mar 03, 2017 at 09:38:04AM -0500] Chet Ramey: On 3/3/17 5:47 AM, Gian Piero Carrubba wrote: Hello all, this is a copy of Debian bug 838437 [0]. I'm posting it here because I failed to find it mentioned in the ml archives. Please disregard if it's b

Re: bash 4.4 - (readline) regression in the behaviour of ^W in vi-mode

2017-03-03 Thread Chet Ramey
On 3/3/17 5:47 AM, Gian Piero Carrubba wrote: > * Please cc me as I'm not subscribed. > > Hello all, > > this is a copy of Debian bug 838437 [0]. I'm posting it here because I > failed to find it mentioned in the ml archives. Please disregard if it's > been already reported. It seems related to

bash 4.4 - (readline) regression in the behaviour of ^W in vi-mode

2017-03-03 Thread Gian Piero Carrubba
* Please cc me as I'm not subscribed. Hello all, this is a copy of Debian bug 838437 [0]. I'm posting it here because I failed to find it mentioned in the ml archives. Please disregard if it's been already reported. --- $ set -o vi $ echo REMOVE maintain With bash-4.3-15 I can recall and m