On 05/23/2014 05:05 PM, Dan Douglas wrote:
On Friday, May 23, 2014 10:48:11 AM Chet Ramey wrote:
On 5/23/14, 10:17 AM, Ondrej Oprala wrote:
Hi, there've recently been a few bug reports against bash on RH BZ,
saying that bash can't handle infinite recursion the way zsh or ksh can.
Looking at ex
On Friday, May 23, 2014 10:48:11 AM Chet Ramey wrote:
> On 5/23/14, 10:17 AM, Ondrej Oprala wrote:
> > Hi, there've recently been a few bug reports against bash on RH BZ,
> > saying that bash can't handle infinite recursion the way zsh or ksh can.
> >
> > Looking at execute_cmd.c, there are the f
On 05/23/2014 04:48 PM, Chet Ramey wrote:
On 5/23/14, 10:17 AM, Ondrej Oprala wrote:
Hi, there've recently been a few bug reports against bash on RH BZ,
saying that bash can't handle infinite recursion the way zsh or ksh can.
Looking at execute_cmd.c, there are the funcnest{,_max} variables
an
On 5/23/14, 10:17 AM, Ondrej Oprala wrote:
> Hi, there've recently been a few bug reports against bash on RH BZ,
> saying that bash can't handle infinite recursion the way zsh or ksh can.
>
> Looking at execute_cmd.c, there are the funcnest{,_max} variables
> and a piece of code using them in exe
On Friday, May 23, 2014 04:17:12 PM Ondrej Oprala wrote:
> Hi, there've recently been a few bug reports against bash on RH BZ,
> saying that bash can't handle infinite recursion the way zsh or ksh can.
They come up here at least a few times a year. E.g.
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-bash
Hi, there've recently been a few bug reports against bash on RH BZ,
saying that bash can't handle infinite recursion the way zsh or ksh can.
Looking at execute_cmd.c, there are the funcnest{,_max} variables
and a piece of code using them in execute_function().
Will funcnest_max be set to non-0
